Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT07020624

Serratus Posterior Superior Intekcostal Plane Block vs Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in VATS: A Randomized Trial"

No phase Interventional Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Postoperative Analgesia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: SAPB, SPSIPB.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery, Postoperative Analgesia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) on Postoperative Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)

Overview

Thoracotomy is known as one of the most painful surgical procedures, with up to 65% of patients developing chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS), and approximately 10% experiencing pain that significantly impacts quality of life. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become increasingly common over the past decade and offers reduced postoperative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay compared to open thoracotomy. However, VATS can still cause moderate to severe postoperative pain and a high risk of chronic pain. Optimizing analgesia after VATS remains critical. With advances in ultrasound technology, several regional anesthesia techniques such as serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have shown comparable efficacy. In 2023, Tulgar et al. described the serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB), which demonstrated dermatomal coverage from C3 to T10. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of SPSIPB and SAPB in patients undergoing VATS procedures.

Detailed description

The patients will be divided into two groups and all will receive general anesthesia. Before extubation, one group will receive a Serratus Anterior Plane Block, and the other group will receive a Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block. The randomization of the study will be performed by a physician who will not be involved in the patient follow-up, using a computer-generated randomization code (generated by the computer). The interfascial plane block (Serratus Anterior Plane Block or Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block) will be given to the anesthesiologist in a sealed envelope by an independent assistant personnel outside the study. The patient will not be aware of which block is being applied. The anesthesiologist performing the block will not participate in the patients' pain monitoring. Postoperative pain assessment and data collection will be performed by another anesthesiologist who is unaware of the study.

For standardization purposes, the block procedure will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who has performed at least 20 successful and uncomplicated procedures before.

Interventions

  • Other SAPB
    Ultrasound guided serratus anterior plane block will be performed.
  • Other SPSIPB
    Ultrasound guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block will be performed.

Primary outcome measures

  • Morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively [Time frame: up to 24 hours]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Pain density [Time frame: up to 24 hours.]
  • Quality of recovery [Time frame: 24 hours after surgery]
  • Nausea and vomiting [Time frame: up to 24 hours]
  • shoulder pain [Time frame: up to 24 hours]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • BMI < 35 kg/m² Patients with ASA scores I, II, III

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not want to be included in the study Psychiatric and neurological disease with blurred consciousness Patients with ASA > 3 BMI > 35 kg/m² Abnormality in coagulation parameters History of allergy to local anesthetic drugs Infection at the injection site Patients whose surgical procedure time exceeds 150 minutes

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Samsun University, — Samsun

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07020624 · SPSIPB

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗