Menu
Recruiting NCT07009834

Solutions to the Challenges of Conduction System Pacing

Observational Conduction System Pacing Pacing Therapy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Conduction System Pacing, Pacing Therapy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 100 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Conduction system pacing is a new way of stimulating the heart using pacemaker wires. Traditional pacemakers stimulate the heart muscle which causes disordered heart beats: the walls of the heart move at different times. This wears down the heart over time. Conduction system pacemakers stimulate the heart's electrical system directly producing natural heart beats that are much less disordered. Unfortunately, these pacemakers can only be implanted by a small group of experts at specialised centres with specialist equipment. This study aims to allow conduction system pacemakers to be offered to any patient at any hospital by simplifying the process of inserting the pacemaker wires and the improving the pacemaker's ability to interpret electrical traces. Firstly, the best locations in the heart for conduction system pacemaker wires using specialised electrical traces, MRI and ultrasound scans will be identified. Features that can be seen on X-ray to guide doctors to these locations will then be identified. Secondly, the investigators will collect electrical information from the pacemaker wires and additional electrical traces to develop an algorithm that can make the interpretation the electrical traces more accurate.

Detailed description

Study A:

100 patients will be prospectively recruited. These patients will be further divided into a derivation and validation group. The derivation group will consist of the first fifty patients recruited (patients 1-50) and the validation group will consist the second fifty patients recruited (patients 51-100).

All 100 patients will have an indication for pacemaker insertion and will undergo a conduction system pacemaker implant.

The derivation group will undergo the research protocol which will include additional measurements from:

1. Ultra-high frequency ECG. A non-invasive surface ECG that detects, isolates and amplifies high frequency components that are filtered out in conventional ECGs. 2. Electro-anatomical mapping. In majority of participants, the invasive mapping catheter will be inserted from the same venous access point to collect detailed electrical and anatomical data. In a small subset of patients, activation maps of the left ventricle will be collected, where the access will be through the femoral artery in the groin.

Non invasive mapping will also be performed in a subgroup of patients with ECGi, where the participants will wear a 252 electrode ECG vest during the procedure. These patients will undergo a pre-procedural CT scan with the vest. 3. Echocardiography. Participants will undergo either transthoracic echocardiography, transoesophageal echocardiography or intracardiac echocardiography.

Additional venous access from the femoral vein in the groin will be sought for patients undergoing intracardiac echocardiography. 4. Haemodynamic assessment Invasive blood pressure will be obtained in patients who already have arterial access for the left ventricular electro- anatomical maps. The sheath will be connected to the pressure inducer. Non invasive beat-by-beat blood pressure will be obtained by a high precision finger cuff (finometer).

A further 50 patients will be prospectively recruited that will make up the validation cohort for Study A. These patients will undergo a conduction system pacemaker as standard clinical practice. The step-by-step algorithm will be prospectively derived from the above to implant the conduction system lead using standard equipment alone; fluoroscopy, PSA and 12-lead ECG. The success rate, conduction system capture threshold, procedure time and fluoroscopy time will be assessed. Although all operators will be highly experienced device implanters, these implants will include operators who are new to conduction system lead implantation.

Study B:

In patients 1-50 undergoing implantation of conduction system pacemakers, 2-lead surface ECG alongside conventional lead data will be collected. A surface 12-lead ECG will be collected as well. The patients will undergo the standard pacing manoeuvres for conduction system pacing. The patient will be paced using the PSA and a 12-lead ECG and 2-lead ECG will be collected via Bard, a computer software that is able to collect highly accurate ECG traces of the heart using mapping catheters placed inside the heart and the surface ECG.

Prospective data from 200 patients with a chronic conduction system lead implant under device follow-up to obtain EGM, 12 -lead ECG and the 2-lead ECG recordings of multiple pacing and sensing configurations will also be collected. These patients will be attending for routine appointments. The pacing and sensing configurations are undertaken as part of routine checks

Primary outcome measures

  • A1: Success rates of conduction system lead implant (novel workflow vs conventional methods) [Time frame: From enrollment until 6 months after recruitment of last patient]
  • B1: The number of patients with morphology change seen during decrementing output threshold test of 2-lead ECG when compared to gold standard 12-lead ECG [Time frame: From enrollment until 6 months after recruitment of last patient]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • A2: Procedure and fluoroscopy times of the streamlined workflow to current conventional methods of His-bundle and Left-bundle pacing [Time frame: From enrolment to until completion of PPM insertion of the last patient recruited into Study A (patient 100); average total of 3 years]
  • A2: Procedure and fluoroscopy times of the streamlined workflow of conduction system implant to current right ventricular pacing [Time frame: From enrolment to until completion of PPM insertion of the last patient recruited into Study A (patient 100); average total of 3 years]
  • A2: Assess capture threshold of conduction system pacing from the optimised workflow to that of conventional methods of conduction system implantation [Time frame: From enrollment until 6 months after recruitment of last patient]
  • A2: Define left bundle area capture diagnostics and delineate differences between left ventricular septal pacing. [Time frame: From enrollment until 6 months after recruitment of last patient]
  • B2: Improvement in device battery life measured in days and months with novel device algorithm applied [Time frame: From enrollment until 6 months after recruitment of last patient]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a ventricular pacing indication: high grade atrioventricular block and symptomatic trifasicular, bifasicular block or left bundle branch block LBBB for cardiac resynchronisation therapy
  • Adults willing to take part (ages 18 - 100 years old)
  • Able to give consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to give consent
  • Children age < 18 years and adults > 100 years old
  • Pregnant patients As per standard of care, female patients of child-bearing age will have a urine pregnancy test prior to their procedure.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United Kingdom · 1 center
  • Imperial College Healthcare Trust; Hammersmith Hospital — London

Identifiers

NCT: NCT07009834 · 23HH8267

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗