Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06999746

Device-Assisted Oropharyngeal Rehabilitation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

No phase Interventional Obstructive Sleep Apnea

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Control, Oropharyngeal Exercise, Continuous positive airway pressure, Continuous positive airway pressure and oropharyngeal exercise.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Basic parameters: 20 years — 68 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Taiwan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effectiveness of Using Force Sensing Resistor to Assist Oropharyngeal Rehabilitation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of device-assisted oropharyngeal rehabilitation (OPR) in improving upper airway muscle function and reducing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity in adult patients diagnosed with OSA who are receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does combining OPR with CPAP increase upper airway space volume compared to using CPAP alone? 2. Does OPR improve tongue muscle strength, and is this improvement associated with reduced CPAP pressure requirements? 3. Do patients receiving OPR (alone or combined with CPAP) show greater improvements in OSA severity and clinical symptoms compared to those receiving CPAP alone or no intervention? Researchers will compare four groups-Control, OPR-only, CPAP-only, and CPAP + OPR-to see if device-assisted OPR enhances treatment outcomes beyond CPAP alone. Participants will: 1. Be randomly assigned to one of four groups (Control, OPR-only, CPAP-only, CPAP+OPR). 2. Perform home-based OPR exercises (30-45 minutes/session, 1-2 sessions/day, 3-5 days/week for 3 months) in the OPR and CPAP+OPR groups. 3. Have their exercise monitored using a strength sensor, with intensity adjusted every 2-4 weeks during hospital visits. 4. Undergo assessments before and after the intervention, including: (1) Polysomnography for OSA severity, (2) CT and ultrasound for upper airway and tongue muscle structure, (3) Tongue muscle strength/endurance tests, (4) Sleep quality questionnaires, (5) CPAP usage and pressure reports.

Detailed description

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory disorder associated with various complications, including cardiovascular, metabolic, and cognitive issues. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy can effectively reduce sleep apnea events and decrease the incidence of related complications. However, studies have shown that approximately half of OSA patients attempting CPAP therapy either cannot tolerate CPAP at all or only partially comply with it. Oropharyngeal rehabilitation (OPR), which involves isometric and isotonic exercises, can enhance the muscle tone of the tongue, pharynx, and soft palate. OPR may serve as one of the treatment options for OSA. Nevertheless, there is limited literature exploring the combined treatment approach of CPAP and OPR.

Methods:This study will recruit 30 200 adult OSA patients, who will be divided into two four groups: Control, OPR, CPAP alone and CPAP+OPR. The OPR training in OPR and CPAP+OPR groups will consist of home-based exercises performed for 30-45 minutes per session, once 1-2 session a day, five 3-5 days a week, over a period of three months. The training will be monitored using a strength sensor, and the intensity of the exercises will be adjusted every two weeks month during hospital visits. Both CPAP and CPAP+OPR groups will continue to wear CPAP every night, while the control group will receive monthly sleep hygiene education. The severity of OSA, upper airway space, tongue muscle length/thickness, tongue muscle strength/endurance, sleep quality, and CPAP usage report will be assessed using polysomnography, computed tomography scans, sonography, tongue muscle function tests, sleep quality questionnaires, and CPAP mask pressure at baseline and after three months of treatment.

Expected outcomes:

1. Compared to the group using only CPAP, the CPAP + OPR group will have an increased upper airway space volume after a 3-month follow-up. The upper airway space volume is negatively correlated with CPAP pressure and positively correlated with tongue muscle strength. 2. After 3 months of OPR treatment, the CPAP + OPR group will show an increase in tongue muscle strength, which is negatively correlated with CPAP pressure. 3. After 3 months of OPR treatment, both the OPR group and the CPAP+OPR group showed greater improvements in upper airway muscle function and greater reductions in obstructive sleep apnea severity and clinical symptoms compared to the control group and the CPAP group respectively.

Interventions

  • Other Control
    Sleep hygiene education
  • Device Oropharyngeal Exercise
    Device-monitoring oropharyngeal exercise, 1-5 days a week for three months
  • Device Continuous positive airway pressure
    Continuous positive airway pressure, 1-5 days a week for three months
  • Device Continuous positive airway pressure and oropharyngeal exercise
    Continuous positive airway pressure and device-monitoring oropharyngeal exercise, 1-5 days a week for three months

Primary outcome measures

  • Apnea-Hypopnea Index [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
  • Tongue Muscle Strength [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Tongue Muscle Endurance [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Pharyngeal Airway Volume [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Cross Section Area on the Tip of Epiglottis [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Anterior to Posterior Distance on the Tip of the Epiglottis [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Lateral Distance on the Tip of Epiglottis [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Sleep Quality [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Daytime Sleepiness Level [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Tongue Muscle Thickness [Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks post intervention]
  • Median Pressure in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure [Time frame: 1-week average pre intervention, 1-week average post intervention and 1-month average during intervention for 3 months]
  • Median Usage Hours of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure [Time frame: 1-week average pre intervention, 1-week average post intervention and 1-month average during intervention for 3 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 20 to 68 years
  • Newly diagnosed with mild to severe pure obstructive sleep apnea based on polysomnography

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe allergic rhinitis
  • Sinusitis with nasal polyps
  • Adenoid hypertrophy
  • Bilateral tonsillar hypertrophy (Friedman grade ≥ III)
  • Lingual tonsil hypertrophy (Friedman grade ≥ III)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40
  • Alcohol or drug abuse within the past year
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe obstructive or restrictive pulmonary diseases
  • High-risk cardiovascular diseases during exercise (e.g., angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, valvular heart disease)
  • History of central or peripheral neurological disorders that interfere with exercise prescription
  • Musculoskeletal or psychological disorders that interfere with exercise prescription
  • Other non-respiratory sleep disorders
  • Sleep disorders with concomitant central sleep apnea

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Taiwan · 1 center
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital — Tainan

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06999746 · B-BR-113-050

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗