Not yet recruiting NCT06998212
The Effect of Smartphone-Based Recording Offer on Patient Satisfaction in Orthopedic Care
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Offer to record encounter.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Patient Satisfaction. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The purpose of this study is to determine patient satisfaction with orthopedic preoperative encounter based on offer to record the encounter on patient personal smartphone.
Interventions
- Behavioral Offer to record encounter
Patient will be given the option to record their clinical encounter on their personal smartphone
Primary outcome measures
- Patient satisfaction with preoperative orthopedic encounter [Time frame: From enrollment to survey completion]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Patient survey responses including if patient recorded visit, reason for recording visit, preference for recording visit [Time frame: From enrollment to survey completion]
- If satisfaction varies by demographic factors (age, race, ethnicity, sex) or by type of procedure that the preop is for [Time frame: Through study completion, average 1 year]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- All patients presenting to RUHS for preoperative orthopedic evaluation
Exclusion criteria
- Patients without smartphones
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
Study locations
United States · 1 center
- Riverside University Health System — Moreno Valley
Publications
- Norgaard B, Kofoed PE, Ohm Kyvik K, Ammentorp J. Communication skills training for health care professionals improves the adult orthopaedic patient's experience of quality of care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Dec;26(4):698-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00982.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16. PMID 22420418
- Meakin R, Weinman J. The 'Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale' (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Fam Pract. 2002 Jun;19(3):257-63. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.3.257. PMID 11978716
- Koh TH, Butow PN, Coory M, Budge D, Collie LA, Whitehall J, Tattersall MH. Provision of taped conversations with neonatologists to mothers of babies in intensive care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007 Jan 6;334(7583):28. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39017.675648.BE. Epub 2006 Dec 1. PMID 17142256
- Wolderslund M, Kofoed PE, Holst R, Axboe M, Ammentorp J. Digital audio recordings improve the outcomes of patient consultations: A randomised cluster trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Aug 29. PMID 27593087
- Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW. Patients recording clinical encounters: a path to empowerment? Assessment by mixed methods. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 11;5(8):e008566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008566. PMID 26264274
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06998212 · 2327150-1