Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06996522

UEMR Versus HSP in the Treatment of Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Less Than 10mm in Size

No phase Interventional Pedunculated Colorectal Polyp

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: underwater endoscopic mucosal resection, Hot snare polypectomy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pedunculated Colorectal Polyp. Basic parameters: 35 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Less Than 10mm in Size: A Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in treating Pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10mm in size.

Detailed description

1. Patients are undergone screening, surveillance, or therapeutic colonoscopy at the Endoscopy department of Gastrointestinal endoscopy center of Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan University. 2. Randomize patients with pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10mm in size into 2 interventional groups based on Random function of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0, including (1) Group 1: Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and (2) Group 2: Hot snare polypectomy (HSP). 3. Collecting variables which consist of primary and secodary outcomes.

Interventions

  • Procedure underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
    The Pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by UEMR
  • Procedure Hot snare polypectomy
    The Pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by HSP

Primary outcome measures

  • Post-polypectomy Bleeding [Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • postoperative electrocoagulation syndrome [Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure]
  • en bloc resection [Time frame: immediately after the procedure]
  • R0 resection [Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure]
  • Delayed perforation [Time frame: 2 weeks after the procedure]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 35 and 80 years
  • Pedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10mm in size in screening, surveillance or therapeutic colonoscopy
  • 0-Isp or 0-Ip according to Paris classification
  • Patients must sign an informed consent form prior to registration in study

Exclusion criteria

  • Unsuitable for removal by UEMR or HSP
  • Suspected malignancy
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal resection
  • Familial adenomatous polyposis or Lynch syndrome
  • Patients taking anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents before the examination
  • Inadequate bowel preparation, defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score < 6
  • ASA >=3
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe comorbid disease involving the heart, lungs, liver, or kidneys.
  • Concurrent serious conditions, including other active malignancies or severe infectious diseases

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan university — Shanghai

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06996522 · 2025K132

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗