Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06995079

Comparıson Of The Effects Of Perıcapsulary Nerve Group Block (Peng Block) And Lumbar Erector Spına Plan Block (Lesp Block) On Postoperatıve Opıoıd Consumptıon

No phase Interventional Pengblock over65years Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Hipfracture

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Postoperative pain assessment of patients who underwent block.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pengblock, over65years, Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block, Hipfracture. Basic parameters: from 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Official title

Comparison of the Effects of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (Peng Block) and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (Lesp Block) on Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

Overview

The aim is to demonstrate that lumbar ESP block provides more effective postoperative analgesia than PENG block in geriatric patients with hip fractures, and reduces postoperative opioid consumption more than PENG block

Interventions

  • Procedure Postoperative pain assessment of patients who underwent block
    Postoperative pain assessment of patients who underwent block

Primary outcome measures

  • postoperative pain [Time frame: 6 month]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with hip fractures
  • over 65 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • long-term surgery
  • Patients who do not want regional anesthesia
  • bleeding disorder disease
  • wound in the operation area

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06995079 · PENGVSLESP

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗