Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Oliceridine Versus Morphine or Sufentanil for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Surgeries: a Randomized Control Trial
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Oliceridine, Morphine, Sufentanil.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Sufentanil, Morphine, Validity, Safety. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus morphine and sufentanil for postoperative analgesia following elective lumbar spine surgery. Methods: In this randomized, controlled trial, 90 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery were allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) with either oliceridine (Group O，1.5mg oliceridine for loading dose， 0.5mg/kg oliceridine for PICA), morphine (Group M，4mg morphine for loading dose，1.5mg/kg morphine for PICA), or sufentanil (Group S，4ug sufentanil for loading dose，1.5ug/kg sufentanil for PICA). The primary outcome was the movement Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 6 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included resting and movement VAS scores, ramsay sation score at 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (excluding the motor VAS score at 6 hours postoperatively); number of PCIA demands and rescue analgesic requirements within 48 hours; hemodynamic parameters at 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after administration of the initial loading dose. The incidence of adverse events within 48 hours postoperatively, such as nausea and vomiting, somnolence, respiratory depression, or pruritus.
Interventions
- Drug Oliceridine
a loading dose of 1.5 mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 oliceridine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour - Drug Morphine
a loading dose of 4 mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour - Drug Sufentanil
A 4 ug loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 ug.kg-1 h-1 was connected. sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
Primary outcome measures
- the movement Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score [Time frame: at 6 hours postoperatively]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Lumbar spine surgery with ASA grades I-III
- Aged 18-65 years
- Ethically, the patient voluntarily accepted this trial and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion criteria
- Severe respiratory and circulatory system diseases
- Nervous system disease
- Mental and psychological disorders
- Abnormal liver and kidney functions
- Participated in another drug clinical research within the past 30 days
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
China · 1 center
- Department of Anqing Hospital Anesthesiology — Anqing
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06990893 · Sun Ling