Menu
Recruiting NCT06989905

MEP Up-conditioning to Target Corticospinal Plasticity

Early Phase I Interventional Spinal Cord Injury Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Up-conditioning of the wrist extensor motor evoked potential.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Spinal Cord Injury, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Operant Conditioning of the Wrist Extensor Motor Evoked Potential to Target Corticospinal Plasticity and Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Overview

Individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury will complete a 10-week training protocol where participants receive non-invasive brain stimulation and feedback on the size of the corresponding muscle response (wrist extensor). Investigators will assess the impact of the brain stimulation training on 1) the brain-to-spinal cord-to-muscle connection and 2) motor functions of the arm and hand. Also, brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging will be collected before and after the training. The imaging measurements will tell investigators about how spinal damage, brain function, and brain structure relate to motor presentation and the response to the training.

Detailed description

Corticospinal function is essential in generating and controlling voluntary movements. Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts corticospinal connections, therefore, often results in weak voluntary activation of muscles and impaired motor control in the upper limb (UL). An intervention that improves corticospinal function could enhance motor function recovery; however, such interventions are not currently readily available to people with incomplete SCI. Operant up-conditioning of a motor evoked potential (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (non- invasive brain stimulation) that can increase corticospinal excitability for the targeted muscle may be able to fill this gap. The overarching hypothesis is that targeting beneficial plasticity to the corticospinal pathway can change the brain and spinal cord and improve upper limb motor function in people with chronic cervical SCI. As initial steps towards testing this, the proposed project aims to apply MEP operant up-conditioning in the wrist extensor of the affected UL, improve corticospinal activation of the wrist extensor, and thereby improve motor functions in which the wrist is involved in individuals with cervical SCI. Recent studies suggest that MEP up- conditioning is feasible and can increase MEP size that reflects corticospinal excitability. Building on those studies, this project will examine the effects of wrist extensor MEP operant up-conditioning in people with chronic cervical SCI. Individuals with weak wrist extension due to incomplete cervical SCI will undergo a standard MEP up-conditioning protocol (6 baseline and 24 up-conditioning sessions over 10 weeks). Before and after the intervention period, neurophysiological measurements, clinical and functional assessments, neuroimaging of the spinal cord and brain will be performed. The results will facilitate development and clinical translation of MEP operant conditioning as a novel non-invasive therapy that may complement other therapies and further enhance motor function recovery in people with SCI or other disorders.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Up-conditioning of the wrist extensor motor evoked potential
    At the beginning of each session, EMG recording and nerve stimulating electrodes are placed over the arm. In all sessions, MEPs will be measured while the sitting subject provides a pre-set level of background muscle EMG with joint angles fixed. In 225 control trials of each baseline sessions and the first 20 trials of conditioning sessions the subject will receive no feedback as to MEP size (i.e., control MEPs). In 225 conditioning trials of each conditioning session, the subject will be encour

Primary outcome measures

  • Extensor Carpi Radialis (ECR) Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude [Time frame: Reported as an average of the 6 baseline sessions (over weeks 1-2) and average of the last 6 conditioning sessions (over weeks 8-10)]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Maximum Voluntary Contraction - ECR [Time frame: Reported as an average of the 6 baseline sessions (over weeks 1-2) and average of the last 6 conditioning sessions (over weeks 8-10)]
  • Capabilities Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) [Time frame: Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post]
  • Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) [Time frame: Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post]
  • Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) [Time frame: Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post]
  • Life Situation Questionnaire Revised (LSQ-R) [Time frame: Baseline, after the 24th conditioning session (typically within 1 week), 1 month and 3 months post]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (≥18 yrs old)
  • A history of injury to spinal cord at or above C6
  • >6 months post SCI
  • Weak wrist extension at least unilaterally
  • Expectation that current medication will be maintained without change for at least 3 months. Stable use of anti-spasticity medication (e.g., baclofen, diazepam, tizanidine) is accepted.

Exclusion criteria

  • Motoneuron injury
  • Medically unstable condition
  • Cognitive impairment
  • A history of epileptic seizures
  • Metal implants in the cranium
  • Implanted biomedical device in or above the chest (e.g., a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant)
  • Extensive use of functional electrical stimulation to the arm on a daily basis
  • Pregnancy (due to changes in posture and potential medical instability)
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • No measurable MEP elicited in the ECR
  • Unable to produce any voluntary ECR EMG activity

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Medical University of South Carolina — Charleston

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06989905 · Pro00138869 · 1K99HD117041

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗