Menu
Recruiting NCT06988111

Management of Post-operative Respiratory Failure by Using NIV and High Velocity Nasal Insufflation (HVNI)

No phase Interventional Respiratory Failure Without Hypercapnia Respiratory Failure With Hypercapnia Postoperative Respiratory Complication

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: BIPAP, Vapotherm.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Respiratory Failure Without Hypercapnia, Respiratory Failure With Hypercapnia, Postoperative Respiratory Complication. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Versus High-Velocity Nasal Cannula (HVNC) in the Management of Acute Post-Operative Respiratory Failure

Overview

Postoperative respiratory failure (PORF) remains a critical driver of morbidity, mortality, and incremental care costs in surgical populations. Traditional escalation often involves invasive mechanical ventilation, which is associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays, and increased resource burden.

Detailed description

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) have both been shown to improve oxygen levels effectively and reduce the need for reintubation in various patient groups. However, head-to-head data in patients with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary function (PORF) are scarce.

This protocol employs a robust and scalable design to generate high-quality evidence, empower perioperative stakeholders, and optimize patient-centric respiratory strategies. We hypothesize that NIV will reduce 72-hour reintubation rates compared to HFNC, translating into shorter ICU stays and lower costs.

Methodology \& Operational Workflow

* Screening \& Consent Identify eligible patients in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) or ICU. Obtain informed consent from the patient or legal surrogate. * Baseline Assessment The baseline assessment includes demographics, comorbidities, and surgical data, as well as baseline arterial blood gases (ABG), vital signs, and comfort scores. * Randomization \& Initiation Allocate via a secure web-based randomization module. Initiate assigned respiratory support within 30 minutes of notification. * Monitoring \& Data Collection The patient is receiving continuous pulse oximetry and respiratory rate monitoring.

ABGs and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) at 1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours. Comfort scores every six hours. Record interface-related adverse events.

\- Escalation Criteria The patient exhibits persistent partial arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) levels of less than 100, even at maximal settings.

Hemodynamic instability occurs due to the use of new-onset vasopressors. Deterioration leading to invasive ventilation → classified as "reintubation."

* Weaning Protocol. Transition to standard oxygen therapy when the flow or pressure is minimal. * Follow-Up \& Discharge Track ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and ventilation-free days (VFD). Keep a record of the 30-day survival rate and any readmissions. * Statistical Analysis Plan Primary Endpoint: Compare reintubation rates using a χ² test; report the risk difference and 95% confidence interval. * Missing Data: Multiple imputation for datasets with ≤ 5% missing data; sensitivity analysis for worst-case scenarios. * Interim Analysis: After 50% enrollment, the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviews efficacy and futility, using O'Brien-Fleming boundaries.

Interventions

  • Device BIPAP
    The second arm (NIV group) will be managed by BIPAP device for post-operative respiratory failure
  • Device Vapotherm
    The first arm (HVNC group) will be managed by Vapotherm device for post-operative respiratory failure

Primary outcome measures

  • Weaning success [Time frame: At 48 hours and then daily for 28 days.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age above 18 years
  • within 48 hours after major surgery
  • PAO2/FIO2 less than 200
  • Signs of respiratory distress and respiratory rate (RR) more than 25 cycles/minute

Exclusion criteria

  • Age below 18 years
  • Pregnant ladies
  • Orofacial trauma or burns
  • Active Gastrointestinal bleeding

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Assuit Univeristy — Asyut

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06988111 · 375690

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗