Comparing Two Methods to Measure Nasogastric Tube Length
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: NCKU-NG system, Conventional blind insertion.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Intubation, Nasogastric, Intubation Intraesophageal, Intubation Depth, Intubation Times. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comparing Two Methods for Estimating Nasogastric Tube Length: A Randomized Control Study
Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using a novel nasogastric tube assisted placement system (NCKU-NG system) can more accurately place the nasogastric tube at the optimal position in the stomach compared to conventional blind insertion techniques in adult inpatients requiring nasogastric tube placement. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the NCKU-NG system improve the accuracy of nasogastric tube placement at the optimal gastric position compared to standard blind insertion? * Does the NCKU-NG system reduce the rate of misplacement (such as entry into the airway or inadequate gastric depth), number of repeated attempts, and complication rate compared to the conventional method? * Can estimation of nasogastric tube length using the NCKU-NG system provide a more reliable reference than external measurement or X-ray? Researchers will compare patients randomized to nasogastric tube insertion with the NCKU-NG system (intervention arm) versus conventional blind insertion following standard external measurement methods (control arm) to see if the NCKU-NG system improves placement accuracy and reduces adverse events. Participants will: * Be randomized to one of two groups: * Intervention group: Receive nasogastric tube insertion using the NCKU-NG system (video-assisted real-time visualization, with active confirmation of passage through the esophagogastric junction and final position in the stomach based on sidehole location). * Control group: Receive traditional nasogastric tube blind bedside insertion based on standard measurement (eg. Nose-Earlobe-Xiphoid + 10 cm). * All procedures will use the same material nasogastric tube (16 French polyurethane radiopaque tube). * Undergo confirmation of tube position by X-ray within 8 hours post-insertion for both groups. * Have the following outcomes assessed: * Placement accuracy (percentage of tubes placed at optimal predefined gastric position) * Number of placement attempts and failures * Rate of inadvertent airway or inadequate placement * Incidence of complications (e.g., aspiration, pneumothorax, gastrointestinal tract injury) * Correlation between video-assisted measurement and X-ray estimation of intragastric length
Interventions
- Device NCKU-NG system
Nasogastric tube insertion with a novel nasogastric tube assisted placement system (NCKU-NG system) - Other Conventional blind insertion
Conventional blind insertion following standard external measurement methods (eg. Nose-Earlobe-Xiphoid + 10 cm)
Primary outcome measures
- Placement accuracy [Time frame: Within 8 hours after the completion of a nasogastric tube insertion; that is, after the X-ray was taken]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
- First-attempt success rate [Time frame: The moment after the completion of an nasogastric tube insertion]
- Number of placement attempts [Time frame: The moment after the completion of an nasogastric tube insertion]
- Insertion time [Time frame: The moment after the completion of an nasogastric tube insertion]
- Incidence of complications [Time frame: A week after the completion of an nasogastric tube insertion]
- Correlation between video-assisted measurement and X-ray estimation of intragastric length [Time frame: Within 8 hours after the completion of an nasogastric tube insertion]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adults (aged ≥18 years)
- Patients requiring nasogastric tube placement
- Patients who are hospitalized
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with a chest wound that prevents palpation of the xiphoid process
- Patients who have had a gastrectomy
- Patients with a gastric tumor
- Patients with a head and neck tumor
- Patients who are agitated and difficult to place the nasogastric tube
- Patients with abnormal esophageal structure
- Patients with a basilar skull fracture
- Patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- Patients with an expected lifespan of less than 48 hours
- Patients who cannot undergo an X-ray confirmation (e.g., pregnant women)
- Patients with unstable blood pressure (mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg)
- Patients with ischemic, perforated, or obstructed bowel
- Patients with high-output fistula/ostomy
- Patients using photosensitive drugs
- Critically ill patients
- Patients with acute needs as determined by the attending physician
- Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 8
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06982495 · A-BR-113-021