Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06969911

Clinical Evaluation of CAD/CAM vs. Conventional Veneer Restorations

No phase Interventional Malformed Tooth

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Laminate veneer CAD/CAM, Laminate Veneer Convetional.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Malformed Tooth. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Long-term Performance and Longevity of Minimally Invasive CAD/CAM Versus Conventional Anterior Veneer Restorations: a Randomized Controlled Trial Over 5 Years.

Overview

The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate tooth-supported veneer restorations fabricated using the CAD/CAM process in comparison to conventionally manufactured pressed veneers on anterior teeth and to assess their long-term performance. Survival and success rates of anterior veneer restorations, as well as patient satisfaction, will be evaluated.

Detailed description

Functional and aesthetic complaints caused by congenital malformations and acquired tooth damage are widely spread. Discomfort involves reduced chewing ability, phonetic problems, hypersensitivity and aesthetic impairments.

Conventionally fabricated all-ceramic veneer restorations reveal a long history of clinical success in minimally invasive rehabilitation of the anterior dentition. Nevertheless, conventional manufacturing techniques are prone to fabrication mistakes and must be handled by experienced dental technicians and dentists which results in very high fabrication costs. Therefore, access to minimally invasive restorations is currently restricted for most of the patients. Innovative CAD/CAM techniques have revolutionised restorative treatment options over the last decades and have made all-ceramic restorations more affordable for patients. With further improvements of the CAD/CAM milling devices the machinability of high-strength glass ceramic is now possible.

The aim of both treatment procedures will be to avoid any extensive additional tooth structure removal, to provide long-term survival and success of the integrated restorations and to improve patient´s satisfaction. Up to now scientific evidence on the clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated veneers is very limited. Aim of this trial is to evaluate if the clinical performance of anterior restorations after minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers compared to conventionally fabricated veneers. Functional and aesthetic treatment results will be assessed for five years and evaluated with regard to failure and succes veneer restorations as well as patient satisfaction.

Interventions

  • Procedure Laminate veneer CAD/CAM
    Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers
  • Procedure Laminate Veneer Convetional
    Minimally invasive therapeutic intervention with CAD/CAM veneers

Primary outcome measures

  • Prosthetic survival time [Time frame: 5 Years]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Prosthetic success [Time frame: 5 Years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • Patients that reveal indication for a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 6 anterior veneer restorations

Exclusion criteria

\- Patients that reveal multiple missing teeth, poor oral hygiene, pronounced parafunctions or with allergies to any of the applied materials

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06969911 · Heinrich-Heine University

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗