The Effect of Patient Advocacy Training on Advocacy Skills, Ethical Sensitivity, and Patient Safety Culture in Nurses
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: measuring knowledge level, educational intervention.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Education. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
The Effect of Patient Advocacy Training on Advocacy Skills, Ethical Sensitivity and Patient Safety Culture in Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Study
Overview
In this study, the aim is to evaluate the effects of patient advocacy training provided to nurses on their advocacy skills, ethical sensitivity, and patient safety culture level.
Detailed description
This research is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) conducted to investigate the impact of patient advocacy training on nurses by evaluating its effectiveness in increasing nurses' ethical sensitivity and promoting a positive patient safety culture through Bloom's Taxonomy. This study, which will deeply examine the relationship between patient advocacy training, ethical sensitivity, and patient safety culture, aims to provide evidence-based insights that can inform nursing education, training programs, and healthcare policies, ultimately contributing to the improvement of patient outcomes and the overall quality of healthcare delivery.
Interventions
- Behavioral measuring knowledge level
The study group consists of 70 nurses, each consisting of 35 people. After the routine training of the hospital was given to the control and experimental groups, their consents were obtained and the pre-tests were completed, they were divided into experimental and control groups using simple randomization. The first group of nurses in the control group will not receive any intervention other than the routine training given by the hospital. - Other educational intervention
the effectiveness of training by making measurements after training and comparing them with pre-training results
Primary outcome measures
- Patient advocacy scale, Moral sensitivity survey, Patient Safety Culture Hospital Survey [Time frame: up to 8 weeks]
- Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses, Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (ADA),Hospital Patient Safety Culture Survey (HSOPSC) [Time frame: up to 8 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Educational intervention [Time frame: after 8 weeks]
- Post-tests after 8 weeks of training [Time frame: 1 month]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Employees who have no obstacles to participating in the training program Exclusion Criteria: Having worked in the hospital for at least six months
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Single group
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06969482 · 203172001002