RCT of Minimalist vs Standard Procedure for LAAC in NVAF Patients
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Minimalism Transcatheter LAAC Group, Standard Transcatheter LAAC Group.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, General Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 85 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Minimalist Procedure With Standard Procedure for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Overview
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective strategy for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Standard procedure requires general anesthesia, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. With the experience accumulation, LAAC can be successfully completed in many centers under local anesthesia, the guidance of X-ray and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), also known as minimalist procedure. Our center was one of the earliest to carry out minimalist procedure worldwide. At present, expert consensus suggests that minimalist procedure is feasible in experienced centers, but the relevant evidence is insufficient. Some single-arm studies have shown that minimalist procedure is safe and effective. However, there is currently a lack of direct evidence to compare the strengths and weaknesses of these two LAAC procedures. The goal of the study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of minimalist procedure and standard procedure for LAAC in patients with NVAF.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of minimalism transcatheter LAAC versus standard transcatheter LAAC in NVAF patients. The study aims to enroll approximately 200 NVAF patients requiring transcatheter LAAC at 20 to 30 research centers in China. All eligible patients who sign the informed consent form will be randomly assigned to either the minimalism transcatheter LAAC group or the standard transcatheter LAAC group in a 1:1 ratio. The study will record preoperative baseline information and follow-up data at 7 days post-Procedure or discharge, and at 2, 6, and 12 months post-Procedure, to explore the incidence of procedure-related complications and peridevice leak ≤5mm between the two groups.
Interventions
- Procedure Minimalism Transcatheter LAAC Group
Patients will undergo transcatheter LAAC under local anesthesia, guided by DSA and TTE, using the WATCHMAN FLX system. The release criteria (PASS: Position, Anchor, Size, Seal) will be confirmed through DSA and TTE. - Procedure Standard Transcatheter LAAC Group
Patients will undergo LAAC under general anesthesia, guided by TEE, using the WATCHMAN FLX system, following the steps outlined in the product manual.
Primary outcome measures
- primary safety [Time frame: 7 days after LAAC procedure]
- primary efficacy [Time frame: From LAAC procedure to the end of treatment at 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Stroke/transient ischemic attack and systemic embolism [Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure]
- Bleeding events; [Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure]
- All-cause death; [Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure]
- Cardiac death; [Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure]
- Device-related thrombosis events; [Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure]
- Immediate procedure success rate [Time frame: Perioperation]
- The duration of the procedure [Time frame: Perioperation]
- the amount of contrast medium [Time frame: Perioperation]
- the amount of radiation [Time frame: Perioperation]
- hospitalization time [Time frame: Perioperation]
- The number of replacements of the device. [Time frame: Perioperation]
- All procedure-related complications [Time frame: at 2, 6, and 12 months post-procedure]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age 18 - 85 years old, all genders;
- Subjects who can understand the purpose of the trial, participate voluntarily and sign the informed consent form, and are willing to complete the follow-up according to the protocol requirements;
- Indications for left atrial appendage closure: non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with CHA2DS2-VAS2 score ≥2 and HAS-BLED score ≥3, or who are unable or unwilling to receive long-term oral anticoagulants;
- Life expectancy ≥1 year;
Exclusion criteria
- Preoperative TEE/heart CT/intracardiac ultrasound suggested thrombus in the left atrial appendage/left atrium;
- Patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥200 μmol/L, creatinine clearance <30 ml/min);
- Liver disease patients with coagulation abnormalities and clinically relevant bleeding risks, including liver cirrhosis patients reaching Child Pugh stages B and C;
- Severely decreased platelet count at baseline: PLT ≤50\*10\^9/L;
- Patients with severe preoperative cardiac insufficiency (LVEF <35%; clinical manifestations are uncontrolled class IV heart failure);
- Combined with other severe cardiac valvular diseases or other structural abnormalities that require surgical treatment on an elective day; or severe coronary heart disease that requires intervention within a fixed period;
- Patients who have lesions or conditions with a significant risk of major bleeding, such as current or recent gastrointestinal ulcers, malignant tumors with a high risk of bleeding, recent brain or spinal injuries, recent brain, spinal or ophthalmic procedure, recent intracranial hemorrhage, known or suspected esophageal varices, arteriovenous malformations, vascular aneurysms, or major intraspinal or intracerebral vascular malformations;
- Patients with concurrent diseases (other than atrial fibrillation) that require anticoagulant therapy (such as after mechanical valve replacement, and spontaneous or recurrent venous thromboembolism);
- Patients who are in clinical trials of other drugs or medical devices and have not completed it yet;
- Patients who are considered ineligible to participate in the clinical trial by the investigator.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
China · 1 center
- Zhongshan Hospital,Fudan Univerisity — Shanghai
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06969118 · MVS-LAAC