Menu
Recruiting NCT06968663

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation + Language Therapy to Treat Subacute Aphasia

Phase II Interventional Stroke Aphasia Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke, Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction. Basic parameters: 18 years — 85 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Electrical Field Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Subacute Post-stroke Aphasia

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) combined with modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT) is an effective treatment for aphasia when delivered in the subacute stage after stroke. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1. Can TMS combined with mCILT improve overall speech? 2. Can we identify specific behavioral and biological characteristics that would benefit most from the TMS and mCILT treatment? Researchers will compare real TMS to sham (fake) TMS to see whether TMS can treat subacute aphasia. Importantly, this trial will use electric field guided TMS to identify optimal and individualized stimulation intensity and site targeting. Participants will: * Complete a screening and medical intake to determine eligibility * Undergo MRI scans * Participate in 10 consecutive sessions (Monday-Friday) of TMS and mCILT treatment * Complete follow-up assessments immediately and 4 months after treatment

Detailed description

Aphasia is an acquired disorder of language that occurs in approximately 30% of individuals with stroke and impacts approximately 1 million Americans (see NINDS.NIH.gov). Current treatments for aphasia are only modestly beneficial, so there is a clear need for more efficacious therapy.

Most studies of TMS as a therapy for aphasia have investigated treatment in the chronic phase after stroke (\>6 months post-stroke). Previous research has demonstrated that TMS improves language performance in persons with chronic aphasia and the benefit has been shown to be sustained. Several lines of evidence, however, suggest that TMS treatment in the subacute period may be more effective than interventions in the chronic stage.

One limitation of TMS has been variability in response; TMS has shown good within-subject reliability but more substantial variability between subjects. In recognition of these issues, "electrical field" (e-field) models have been developed to account for these individual differences in anatomy. We will the utilize e-field models in conjunction with an individually determined resting motor threshold to generate a personalized treatment regimen that is likely to ensure that all subjects receive the same TMS intensity relative to their individual motor threshold and greatly reduces the possibility of under- or over-dosing with respect to TMS intensity. We will employ continuous theta-burst stimulation, 600 brief electrical pulses delivered in 40 seconds, over the right front part of the brain (pars triangularis).

Participants who are enrolled can expect to undergo a battery of tests to define their language function as well as a research MRI scan that will be used to guide TMS therapy and to assess the size and location of the stroke and its impact on brain pathways. After baseline testing, subjects will undergo treatment using TMS (or sham) + mCILT for 10 sessions (Monday-Friday) over the course of 2 consecutives week. Follow-up assessment of language functioning will be assessed immediately and 4 months after treatment.

Participants will be compensated for their time and travel.

Interventions

  • Device Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
    TMS, is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain. In this study we will utilize theta-burst stimulation which uses a higher frequency pulse of 50 Hz delivered for 40 seconds for a total of 600 pulses.
  • Behavioral Modified Constraint Induced Language Therapy (mCILT)
    Constraint-induced language therapy (CILT) is a treatment approach for aphasia that focuses on forcing the patient to use their impaired language skills, while restricting the use of compensatory strategies like gestures or writing. All participants will receive mCILT.

Primary outcome measures

  • Overall language function [Time frame: From Baseline to 4 months post-interventions]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Left hemisphere stroke resulting in aphasia
  • The stroke must have occurred between 2 and 6 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Must be able to understand the nature of the study, and give informed consent
  • English proficiency
  • Right-handed

Exclusion criteria

  • History of serious and/or ongoing issues with substance abuse
  • Previous head trauma with loss of consciousness for more than 5 minutes
  • History of major psychiatric illness
  • Dementia, or other neurological conditions
  • Epilepsy, or seizure after the stroke event
  • Pacemaker
  • Diagnosis of tinnitus
  • Pregnancy

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • University of Pennsylvania — Philadelphia

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06968663 · 856766

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗