A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on Minimally Invasive Breast Effects Between the Modified Local Compression Bandaging Method and the Traditional Whole Breast Compression Bandaging Method
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: The group using the whole-breast bandaging method, The group using the local bandaging method.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Minimally Invasive Mammary Gland Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 70 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
I. Research Background Due to the relatively large trauma to the breast caused by traditional general anesthesia surgery, long recovery time, high incidence of postoperative complications, and patients' fear of general anesthesia surgery, the Mammotome minimally invasive rotary excision surgery has emerged. This minimally invasive breast surgery has very prominent advantages, mainly manifested as visualization, small incisions, and safety and reliability. Currently, the commonly used bandaging method after minimally invasive breast surgery in clinical practice is the whole-breast compression bandaging method. One or two sterile loose gauze pieces are kneaded into a gauze ball and pressed on the residual cavity. Then, 5 to 8 loose gauze pieces are continuously stacked with the gauze ball within a 5 cm diameter around the wound for bandaging. Finally, an elastic bra is used for another day of compression bandaging. The elastic bra is a special compression elastic bandage for postoperative breast use to achieve auxiliary therapeutic effects such as clearing the cavity and protecting the surgical incision. However, in the process of clinical practice, it has been found that this bandaging method brings great discomfort to patients. It is not only reflected in varying degrees of skin itching on the covered skin, and there are many cases of local red rashes. Moreover, it affects the patients' breathing. The vast majority of patients complain of pain and discomfort caused by the tight binding on the chest and back, feeling restless when sitting or lying down. At night, they can only sleep in a semi-sitting position and are largely unable to enter a deep sleep, seriously affecting the patients' daily activities and sleep conditions. In order to improve the patients' experience and reduce their discomfort as much as possible, the medical and nursing joint team explored and improved the compression bandaging method after minimally invasive surgery and found that the local compression bandaging method is more comfortable. That is, one or two loose gauze pieces are kneaded into a gauze ball to replace multiple gauze balls and placed at the residual cavity. Then, elastic medical adhesive tape is used for local compression and sticking. Finally, a pure cotton clean towel is placed inside the elastic bra, and the elastic bra is worn for one day. According to the results of a pre-experiment involving 50 cases, among the patients using the local compression bandaging method, there was no occurrence of wound hematoma, and their skin itching, chest and back pain, comfort level, and sleep conditions were all improved. In order to further compare the application effects of the whole-breast compression bandaging method and the local compression bandaging method, the research team of this study intends to conduct a comparative study of the two methods. II. Research Objectives Research Objectives: Through a randomized controlled study, compare and study the curative effects of two different bandaging methods, namely the whole-breast bandaging method and the local bandaging method, during the perioperative period of minimally invasive breast surgery. Evaluate the impacts of the two bandaging methods on the wound healing situation after minimally invasive breast surgery, the incidence of hematoma, the patients' comfort level, and the incidence of patients' pain.
Interventions
- Procedure The group using the whole-breast bandaging method
Use 1 to 2 pieces of sterile loose gauze to knead into a gauze ball, press it on the residual cavity. Then, continue to use 5 to 8 pieces of loose gauze to stack gauze balls within a diameter of 5 cm around the wound for bandaging. Finally, apply compression bandaging with an elastic bra. The time for compression bandaging with the elastic bra is 24 hours. - Procedure The group using the local bandaging method
Knead one or two pieces of loose gauze into a gauze ball to replace multiple gauze balls and place it in the residual cavity. Then, use elastic medical adhesive tape for local compression and sticking. Finally, place a pure cotton clean towel inside the elastic bra and wear the elastic bra for just one day.
Primary outcome measures
- The incidence of hematoma in patients: Use breast color Doppler ultrasound to check the wound healing condition and the presence of hematoma [Time frame: At 2 weeks and 3 months after the operation respectively.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age between 18 and 70 years old.
- The ultrasound report shows category 3 or category 4A.
- Patients without allergy to medical adhesive tape.
- Patients without hematopoietic system diseases such as bleeding tendency and coagulation dysfunction.
- Willingly participate in the investigation and study.
- No fever and no infection found during the admission physical examination.
Exclusion criteria
- 1\. Patients with malignant breast tumors. 2. Patients with mental illnesses. 3. Patients who do not meet the indications for minimally invasive surgery according to the examination results.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06964516 · KY2025-202-03