Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06961461

AI-assisted Quality Control Study of Multimodal Data in the Epidemiological Survey of Shanghai Nicheng Cohort Study

— Observational Quality Control Cohort Studies

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: AI-assisted quality control tool.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Quality Control, Cohort Studies. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Overview

This study is based on the Nicheng Cohort study. This study intends to analyze whether AI assistance can effectively improve the efficiency and accuracy of quality control of data collected in large-scale epidemiological surveys based on traditional quality control processes.

Detailed description

This study randomly divided quality control personnel into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group adopts AI assisted quality control: the AI system automatically transcribes the recorded text of the questionnaire, extracts keywords, analyzes the consistency of the Q\&A logic, and generates quality control prompts. The quality control personnel will verify the question fragments according to the prompts and determine the qualification of the questionnaire; The control group relies entirely on manual quality control: the quality control personnel listen to the recording word by word, manually record the content, independently identify keyword omissions, logical contradictions, or terminology deviations, and ultimately determine whether the questionnaire is qualified. The core difference lies in the fact that the experimental group uses AI technology to accurately locate risk issues, reducing the burden of manual comprehensive screening, while the control group requires full manual review without targeted support.

Interventions

  • Other AI-assisted quality control tool
    In this study, quality control personnel will be randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group, and will use artificial intelligence-assisted quality control and manual quality control to conduct quality control on the data collected from the epidemiological survey. Experimental group: Quality control personnel will use the AI system to perform quality control on the questionnaire recordings. Control group: The questionnaire content was checked by manually listening back to t

Primary outcome measures

  • Accuracy [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of questionnaire quality control at 8 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Completeness and consistency [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of questionnaire quality control at 8 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Be proficient in using computers;
  • The person responsible for questionnaire quality control needs to have good dialect recognition ability;
  • Have a basic understanding or high acceptance of AI-assisted tools, and be able to adapt to the learning and application of new technologies
  • Be able to participate in the research throughout the process, abide by the research process, receive training, and be willing to complete quality control tasks as required.

Exclusion criteria

  • The person responsible for questionnaire quality control cannot understand or recognize Shanghai Nanhui dialect proficiently;
  • Unfamiliar with AI-assisted tools and difficult to accept technical operations;
  • Unable to participate in the research, receive training or complete the specified tasks due to other work or academic reasons;

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06961461 · 2025-04

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗