Motor Imagery Training for Upper Limb Functional Strength in Chronic Stroke Patients
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Intervention Group A Conventional Physical Therapy, Intervention Group B Motor Imagery with Conventional Physical Therapy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Chronic Stroke. Basic parameters: from 45 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Pakistan
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Stroke is a leading cause of upper extremity deficits worldwide. Persistent upper extremity dysfunction affects many post stroke patients and is strongly associated with decreased activities of daily living and poor quality of life. There is accumulating evidence of a cross-over effect with training of one limb that slightly increase strength and coordination in contralateral untrained limb through neurological adaptations. One of rehabilitation that is beneficial for stroke patient is motor imagery, a mental rehearsal of a movement that does not include physical movement has been shown to enhance upper limb function. Evidence demonstrate that MI not only activates motor cortical and subcortical regions but also induces plastic change in motor networks and modulates synaptic activity at spinal level.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVE:
The objectives of this study are:
1. To improve upper limb functional strength. 2. To improve the upper limb coordination. 3. To improve upper limb functional improvement.
HYPOTHESIS
Alternate Hypothesis:
There will be statistically significant difference in effects of motor imagery technique combined with conventional physical therapy and in comparison to conventional physical therapy alone on upper limb functional strength, coordination and functional improvement in chronic stroke. (p\<0.05).
Null Hypothesis:
There will be no statistically significant difference in effects of motor imagery technique combined with conventional physical therapy and in comparison to conventional physical therapy alone on upper limb functional strength, coordination and functional improvement in chronic stroke. (p\>0.05).
Research Design: Experimental study. Randomized Control Trial
Interventions
- Procedure Intervention Group A Conventional Physical Therapy
Active Range of Motion Exercises: (5-10 reps with 2 sets) Finger bends, finger spreads, finger to thumb opposition, thumb to palm stretches, palm up and down, wrist rotation, wrist bends, elbow bends, shoulder shrugging and shoulder rotation. Strengthening Exercises: (10-15 reps 2 sets weight 500 ml to 1L water bottle). Finger pinch, power grip, finger spread, pushing movement, wrist curls, roll and squeeze, bicep curls, side arm raise, lifting objects to a height, pulling resistance band. Coo - Procedure Intervention Group B Motor Imagery with Conventional Physical Therapy
1. Subjects will be asked to sit comfortably on a chair with a backrest. A Quiet environment is ensured for proper concentration of subject .Take deep breaths for 2-3 min to relax. 2. Subjects will be asked to close their eyes and imagine the training scene for each task for 5 min while listening to the therapist 's voice describing the motion. 3. The non-paralysis part of the body's movement was imagined first and then the movement of the paralysis part was imagined. 4. Upon completion of the m
Primary outcome measures
- FUNCTIONAL STRENGTH [Time frame: 8 weeks]
- Coordination [Time frame: 8 weeks]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Stroke duration 6 months onwards (chronic stroke).
- age 45 years and above.
- Both genders.
- Access cognitive function score > 24 on MoCA.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with any comorbidity, previous surgery and congenital anomly.
- Patient with any fracture/ MSK disorders.
- Score 3 or more on Modified Ashworth scale.
- Patients with hearing impairments
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- N/A
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Pakistan · 1 center
- Foundation University College of Physical Thrapy — Islamabad
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06945185 · FUI/CTR/2024/64