Menu
Recruiting NCT06909097

Better Breaks: Strength Breaks vs Walk Breaks for Sedentary Behavior Breaks

No phase Interventional Sedentary Employees

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Sitting breaks.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Sedentary Employees. Basic parameters: from 30 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

MOV'D Strength Snacks vs Walk Breaks Study: Health Performance Gains Across Domains

Overview

This study investigates the benefits of two different types of 2 minute activity breaks during sedentary workdays for people who sit for long periods of time in sedentary jobs.

Detailed description

For this study, participants are randomly assigned to one of two physical activity breaks and for 8 weeks are to do 4 per day and track their daily breaks and productivity. There are many measurements including: in-person strength assessments at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months; daily tracking of breaks; pre and post oral glucose tolerance tests; pre and post 10-day diet tracking; pre and post 10-day Continuous Glucose Monitoring with a Dexcom; genome with saliva at pre; and -omics at pre and post.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Sitting breaks
    Participants will take 2 minute physical movement breaks throughout a sedentary work day.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change in average area under the curve for glucose from a 10 day continuous glucose monitors [Time frame: from baseline to post (8 weeks)]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Change in strength from pre to post [Time frame: from baseline to 8 weeks]
  • Change in endurance from pre to post [Time frame: from baseline to 8 weeks]
  • Change in one legged strength from pre to post [Time frame: from baseline to 8 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

\-

Identify inclusion criteria.

  • Sedentary occupation (e.g., clerical work, data entry, call center, receptionists)
  • Full time employment remote or on-site
  • Able to safely perform bodyweight squats and lunges
  • Over 30 years old
  • Not currently doing a strength training program
  • Not currently taking planned activity breaks at work
  • Has a smart phone with a camera and unlimited text plans
  • Interested in participating
  • Fluent in English
  • Not currently on insulin or any glucose lowering medication

Exclusion criteria

  • Yes to any of the physical activity readiness criteria questionnaire (e.g. cardiac symptoms with increasing heart rate, dizziness upon performing exercise)
  • Participating in another research study on diet, weight loss, or any physical activity.
  • If their doctor has ever said to not strength train
  • Having insulin dependence

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Stanford Prevention Research Center — Palo Alto

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06909097 · 73022

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗