Menu
Recruiting NCT06908200

Effect of Radiofrequency in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain With an Associated Myofascial Syndrome Versus Myofascial Therapy and no Treatment

No phase Interventional Chronic Pelvic Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Radiofrequency therapy, myofascial manual therapy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Chronic Pelvic Pain. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Spain
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effect of Radiofrequency in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain With an Associated Myofascial Syndrome Versus Myofascial Therapy and no Treatment: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

A randomised clinical trial is being conducted in the Gynecology Department of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona in women presenting chronic pelvic pain syndrome due to a myofascial cause which is over a 4 score in the VAS scale and not related to an obstetric injury. This study presents 4 groups; two groups receive 8 radiofrequency sessions, one group receives 8 sessions of myofascial release therapy (MRT) and the last group receives no treatment at all (NT). The two RF groups have been divided into a RF intervention group (RFIG) and a RF control group (RFCG) which receives sham treatment. The RF groups are double-blinded. Other than RF, both groups perform daily Thiele massage at home. The sessions last for 20 minutes and take place once a week during 8 weeks. The main variable evaluated is the level of pain during the muscular assessment carried out by an expert pelvic floor physical therapist using the Verbal numeric Scale in the first session and at the end of the 8 sessions. Secondary variables are: sexual function (throughout FSFI questionnaire), pain catastrophizing (ECD), quality of life (EQ5D), anxiety and depression (HADS), central sensitization (CSI) as well as other pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms (PFDI).

Interventions

  • Device Radiofrequency therapy
    Radiofrequency or myofascial manual therapy sessions including the abdominal region, the vulva and pelvic floor tissue and Thiele massage done daily by the patient at home
  • Other myofascial manual therapy
    Myofascial manual therapy sessions including the abdominal region, the vulva and pelvic floor tissue and Thiele massage done daily by the patient at home

Primary outcome measures

  • Pain Level [Time frame: 8 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Sexual function [Time frame: 8 weeks]
  • Quality of life (QoL) [Time frame: 8 weeks]
  • Pain catastrophizing [Time frame: 8 weeks]
  • Anxiety and depression [Time frame: 8 weeks]
  • Central sensitization [Time frame: 8 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria included women who were:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Presenting with pelvic pain persisting for at least 6 months
  • Diagnosed with myofascial syndrome of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) by a specialist based on physical assessment
  • Presenting with pelvic pain intensity greater than 4 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the last 3 months
  • Agreed to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria included the following:

  • Patients who were pregnant
  • Postpartum patients who had given birth within the last year
  • Patients with a history of vulvovaginal pathology
  • Contraindications for the use of radiofrequency: metal implants or active infection
  • Patients with a history of pelvic cancer, including those who had undergone chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or brachytherapy.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Spain · 1 center
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona — Barcelona

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06908200 · HCB/2021/0313 · HCB/2021/0313

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗