Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT06900673

Reducing Disparities in Access to Evidence-Based Services for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Through Technology

Early Phase I Interventional Control Condition Intervention Condition

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Collaborative Life Skills.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Control Condition, Intervention Condition. Basic parameters: from 7 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Reducing Disparities in Access to Evidence-Based Services for ADHD Through Technology

Overview

This project aims to develop an adaptation of the Collaborative Life Skills Program (CLS) that will be supported by mHealth technology. CLS is an evidence-based intervention for 2nd-5th grade children with ADHD that is delivered in schools through coordinated efforts among school mental health providers, teachers, and parents. School mental health providers are trained to coordinate evidence-based teacher- (i.e., Daily Behavioral Report Card) and parent-mediated (i.e., Behavioral Parent Training) behavioral interventions, and lead child social and organizational skills training groups. The adapted intervention, which integrates mHealth technology (CLS-M), will improve the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of CLS in schools with limited resources serving children from low-socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic/racial minority (ERM) backgrounds, reducing disparities in access to evidence-based ADHD interventions in these populations. Barriers to service use in schools where low-SES and ERM families are most likely to receive services include logistical constraints (e.g., time, transportation, childcare, work schedules), perceptual barriers (e.g., cultural mistrust, stigma, perceived efficacy), and insufficient resources (e.g., staff, time, consultation support). Building on prior research, the investigators will develop and test a fully functional web-based mHealth application to support CLS-M that includes an integrated user portal for school mental health providers, teachers, and parents. The application will also include separate interfaces that support key features to facilitate each person's role in CLS implementation at school or at home, such as access to shared information about child assessments, goals, and automatically generated graphs of child Daily Behavioral Report Card performance. Messaging features will facilitate communication among school mental health providers, parents, and teachers, and calendar features that integrate with third- party calendar applications (e.g., Google Calendar) will facilitate scheduling, meeting tracking, and sharing links to third-party videoconferencing applications (e.g., Zoom). Based on stakeholder feedback from school administrators, school mental health providers, teachers, and parents, the investigators will work with mobile application developers to design a fully functional web-based mHealth application prototype to support the CLS-M protocol. the investigators will then test and refine the prototype through a series of individual usability tests and an open feasibility trial. the investigators will also collect formative data from stakeholders in rural schools in Imperial County to inform future research on adapting CLS-M for low-SES and ERM families served in this setting. Finally, the investigators will conduct a Hybrid Type I cluster randomized trial in 24 schools in a large urban school district, to evaluate whether CLS-M results in acceptable implementation outcomes and improved child outcomes in comparison to usual school services. The specific aims are to 1) Develop CLS-M and test its usability, feasibility, and acceptability among key stakeholders; 2) Collect formative data to inform future CLS-M adaptations for families living in rural settings; and 3) Evaluate CLS-M implementation and impact on child outcomes relative to typical school services.

Detailed description

The proposed pilot project aims to extend the reach of evidence-based behavioral intervention services for children from low-SES and ERM families by developing the first school-based after-school intervention model for elementary school children with ADHD and enhancing it with mobile health (mHealth) technology. In partnership with an urban elementary school, the investigators will recruit panels of key opinion leaders representing five stakeholder groups, including teachers, school mental health professionals, after-school staff, parents, and children with ADHD to participate in a series of three focus groups that aim to:

Aim 1: Assess the existing resources, organizational capacity, and unmet needs of low-SES and ERM children with ADHD at the school. Focus groups will be conducted with each stakeholder panel to identify the service capacity and unmet needs of children with ADHD. A logic model of the problem will be developed to inform the identification of existing evidence-based interventions and mHealth solutions that could fit the context.

Aim 2: Adapt existing interventions and design mock mHealth application prototypes. Intervention models and mHealth solutions will be presented to stakeholder panels in a second set of focus groups to solicit feedback about the perceived need for adaptations to the interventions and fit of the mHealth solutions with the needs, environment, conditions, capacity, and culture of the target school/population. Adaptations will be made the to intervention and mock mHealth examples based on stakeholder feedback will produce an intervention model prototypes.

Aim 3: Evaluate the perceived usability, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention model and mock mHealth prototypes. A third set of focus groups with stakeholder panels will assess their perceptions of the intervention model and mock mHealth prototypes. Usability testing of the mHealth prototypes will be conducted with three members of each panel to identify design issues, assess task completion, and solicit user feedback.

Impact: The findings of the present project will lay the foundation for a subsequent proposal for funding (e.g., R21, R34) to further develop the intervention materials and mHealth applications and evaluate their feasibility and initial impact in a pilot implementation trial.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Collaborative Life Skills
    Student, parents, and teachers in the intervention condition will receive the digitally adapted Collaborative Life Skills program.

Primary outcome measures

  • Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]
  • Children's Organizational Skills Scales [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]
  • Impairment Rating Scale [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]
  • Homework Problems Checklist [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]
  • Academic Competency Evaluation Scale [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Alabama Parenting Questionnaire [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]
  • Parent-Teacher Involvement Questionnaire [Time frame: Screening, Baseline, the week after the end of the 8-week intervention, and follow-up approximately 2 months after the subsequent school year starts.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants in study must be be teachers, parents of children with ADHD, and school mental health providers.
  • Students will be identified by school staff and administrators, with whom the investigators have existing relationships.
  • Caregivers/parents will be included if their students are:
  • Enrolled full-time in a participating elementary schools.
  • In a mainstream classroom for the majority of the school day
  • In 2nd- 5th grade
  • Are eligible for free or reduced lunch
  • Parents must also live with the identified child.

Exclusion criteria

  • Parents are excluded from the study if their children have:
  • Significant visual impairment
  • Significant hearing impairment
  • Severe language delay
  • Psychosis
  • Pervasive developmental disorder
  • Global intellectual impairment.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • San Diego State University HealthLINK Center for Transdisciplinary Health Disparities Rese — San Diego

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06900673 · HS-2024-0193 · U54MD012397

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗