Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06895915

Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement Using Robotic System Versus Dynamic Navigation System in Anterior Maxillae: A Random Controlled Clinical Trial

No phase Interventional Tooth Diseases

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: dynamic navigation surgery, robotic surgery.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Tooth Diseases. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning in immediate implant placement compared to free hand procedure. On the basis of dynamic navigation, robotic system uses the robotic arm to replace the manual process of implant bed preparation and implant placement, therefore improving the accuracy of implant placement theoretically. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction between dynamic navigation and robotic assisted immediate implant placement in maxillae. Subjects will be randomized to either group based on the allocation. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up CBCT scan taken at the end of the surgery. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess both patient reported and professional outcomes.

Detailed description

Prosthetic-driven immediate implant placement for optimal aesthetic restoration has been increasing in demand during the last decades but requires higher accuracy. Dynamic navigation has been reported better implant positioning in immediate implant placement compared to free hand procedure. However, dynamic navigation faces the following deficiencies in immediate implant placement. Firstly, it has a steep learning curve. Secondly, the rigid palatal bone wall of the socket will force the direction of drill deviating buccally. On the basis of dynamic navigation, robotic system uses the robotic arm to replace the manual process of implant bed preparation and implant placement, therefore improving the accuracy of implant placement theoretically. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction between dynamic navigation and robotic assisted immediate implant placement in maxillae. Subjects will be randomized to either treatment modalities based on the plan. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up scan taken at the end of the surgery. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess the professional outcomes.

Interventions

  • Procedure dynamic navigation surgery
    immediate implant placement assisted by dynamic navigation
  • Procedure robotic surgery
    immediate implant placement assisted by robotic surgery

Primary outcome measures

  • Implant positional accuracy [Time frame: immediately after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Surgery time [Time frame: intraoperative]
  • Pain perception [Time frame: Immediately after surgery]
  • Pain perception [Time frame: 7 days after surgery]
  • Surgeon preference [Time frame: Immediately after surgery]
  • Soft tissue changes [Time frame: immediately after crown delivery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • a. ≥18 years old and in good health; b. One or more maxillary incisors that cannot be retained due to non-periodontitis; c. The buccal bone plate is intact; d. No acute infection; e. The extraction socket have at least 3-5 mm apical bone.

Exclusion criteria

  • a. General contraindications of oral implant surgery (such as immunodeficiency, long-term use of corticosteroids); b. Treatments or diseases that may affect bone tissue metabolism (for example, taking bisphosphonates or receiving local radiotherapy); c. Periodontitis history or uncontrolled periodontitis. Bleeding of probing (BOP) positive site ≥ 10%, or probing depth (PD) ≥ 4mm; d. Heavy smokers or previous heavy smoking history (quit smoking time <5 years or> 20 cigarettes per day); e. Refuse to participate in this trial.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Department of oral implantology — Shanghai

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06895915 · SH9H-2024-T306-2

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗