Efficacy of New Silver-coated Prosthesis in Reducing the Incidence of Periprosthetic Infections
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: silver coated device, not silver coated device.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Hip Infection. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Italy
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy of New Silver-coated Prosthesis in Reducing the Incidence of Periprosthetic Infections
Overview
The aim of the present clinical study, of prospective observational nature with biological study, is to conduct a clinical investigation on the the efficacy of a device coated with bacteriostatic silver coating, with the overall objective of understand whether the device is indeed able to reduce the number of peri-operative and post-operative infections, both early and late.
Detailed description
Among the various complications that can arise in orthopaedics following implant surgery, peri-prosthetic joint infections (Periprosthetic Joint Infection -PJI) represent one of the most feared complications and the main cause of revision surgeries (15% and 25% of hip and knee revision surgeries, respectively). In this complex context, prevention therefore plays a fundamental role and is a key objective considering the increasing number of patients considered to be at high risk such as the elderly, patients with recurrent infections (urinary, pulmonary, etc.), those suffering from diabetes mellitus or obese, the immunocompromised, or patients who have already undergone prosthetic surgery.
In order to reduce the risk of infection, it is therefore essential to adopt and implement preventive strategies that also involve the medical devices themselves, such as the development of passive surfaces capable of counteracting bacterial adhesion or active surfaces capable of exerting a direct action on micro-organisms. To achieve this second type of action, antibacterial agents, such as silver, known for its antimicrobial and bactericidal properties, are used.
Interventions
- Device silver coated device
Patients who will be implanted with prosthesis with a silver coating to counteract infection relapse - Device not silver coated device
Patients who will be implanted with prosthesis without silver coating
Primary outcome measures
- Number of infections [Time frame: at 1 month follow-up, at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up]
- Safety profile of silver [Time frame: day 0 (at baseline), at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Clinical scores 1 [Time frame: day 0 (at baseline), at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up]
- Clinical scores 2 [Time frame: day 0 (at baseline), at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up]
- Osteointegration [Time frame: at 1 month follow-up at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up]
- Complications [Time frame: at 1 month follow-up, at 3 months follow-up, at 6 months follow-up, at 12 months follow-up, at 24 months follow-up]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years;
- Immunocompromised patients and/or diabetic patients.
- Patients who have given consent
Exclusion criteria
- Patients aged < 18 years;
- Pregnant women;
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
Study locations
Italy · 2 centers
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli — Bologna
- Ospedale Mazzolani Vandini — Argenta
Publications
- Akay S, Yaghmur A. Recent Advances in Antibacterial Coatings to Combat Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections. Molecules. 2024 Mar 6;29(5):1172. doi: 10.3390/molecules29051172. PMID 38474684
- Chen X, Zhou J, Qian Y, Zhao L. Antibacterial coatings on orthopedic implants. Mater Today Bio. 2023 Feb 15;19:100586. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100586. eCollection 2023 Apr. PMID 36896412
- Shichman I, Roof M, Askew N, Nherera L, Rozell JC, Seyler TM, Schwarzkopf R. Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040-2060. JB JS Open Access. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):e22.00112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00112. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar. PMID 36864906
- Tan TL, Maltenfort MG, Chen AF, Shahi A, Higuera CA, Siqueira M, Parvizi J. Development and Evaluation of a Preoperative Risk Calculator for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Joint Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 May 2;100(9):777-785. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01435. PMID 29715226
- Smolle MA, Bergovec M, Scheipl S, Gossler W, Amerstorfer F, Glehr M, Leithner A, Friesenbichler J. Long-term changes in serum silver concentrations after extremity reconstruction with silver-coated megaprostheses. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16707-0. PMID 35906279
- Scoccianti G, Frenos F, Beltrami G, Campanacci DA, Capanna R. Levels of silver ions in body fluids and clinical results in silver-coated megaprostheses after tumour, trauma or failed arthroplasty. Injury. 2016 Oct;47 Suppl 4:S11-S16. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.042. Epub 2016 Aug 11. PMID 27523624
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06887816 · Silver ProTect