Stop Air Leak by Talc or Autologous Blood Patch Therapy

Official title

A Pilot Randomised Study Comparing the Clinical Efficacy of Stopping Air Leak by Talc Pleurodesis or Autologous Blood Patch Therapy in Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Overview

Objectives: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles of intrapleural talc pleurodesis versus autologous blood patch therapy(ABPT) in patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax(SSP) complicated by persistent air leak(PAL), and to assess the trial feasibility for a subsequent full-scale, multicentre randomised controlled trial(RCT). Hypothesis: Talc pleurodesis and ABPT demonstrate comparable efficacy in stopping PAL and facilitating chest drain removal within 5 days. Design and subjects: This single-centre, two-arm, open-label pilot RCT will recruit 30 patients with SSP and PAL persisting ≥5 days. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive intrapleural talc pleurodesis or ABPT. Digital chest drain systems will continuously record air leak rates from 24 hours before randomization until 120 hours post-intervention, ensuring objective, real-time data capture. Patients will be followed till 90 days post-discharge. Interventions: Recruited subjects with PAL ≥5 days will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive talc pleurodesis or ABPT. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is complete cessation of air leak and successful chest drain removal within 5 days after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include absolute and percentage changes in digitally measured air leak rates, duration of chest drainage, recurrence of ipsilateral pneumothorax, need for additional pleural interventions, and safety outcomes such as drain blockage and pleural infection. Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis for all randomised subjects with regression models adjusting for confounders. The pilot outcomes will inform sample size calculations and refine design parameters for the proposed full-scale multicentre RCT.

Detailed description

Pneumothorax, defined as the presence of air in the pleural space, is a common respiratory emergency that often necessitates prolonged hospitalisation. In cases where pneumothorax occurs in the setting of underlying chronic lung diseases (secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, SSP), the clinical course is considerably more severe. SSP patients are typically more hypoxic, more likely to develop persistent air leak (PAL) (exceeding 5-7 days), and experience longer hospital stays with higher in-patient mortality compared to those with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP).

The management of SSP with PAL remains controversial despite its clinical significance. Numerous strategies, including chemical pleurodesis, autologous blood patch therapy (ABPT), implantation of endobronchial valves (EBV), and surgical pleurodesis, are employed in practice. However, many SSP patients are unsuitable for invasive procedures such as EBV placement or surgery, owing to their poor premorbid status. In this context, ABPT and chemical pleurodesis (often using talc) emerge as low-cost, bedside alternatives. Yet, current practices vary widely, and a lack of robust comparative evidence has left clinicians with no definitive guidance regarding the optimal management approach.

Talc pleurodesis, involving the intrapleural instillation of sterile talc powder, is a commonly adopted treatment for SSP with PAL. Retrospective studies indicate that 37.2% to 44.5% of SSP patients undergo chemical pleurodesis, with talc being the predominant agent. Reported treatment success is around 70%, with a median drainage duration of 12 days post-procedure. Adverse events, most notably chest pain affecting roughly one-third of patients, are not uncommon, although more serious complications such as respiratory distress occur in only 1.6% of cases. Nonetheless, these findings are derived from studies with retrospective designs and variable methodologies, limiting firm conclusions on efficacy and safety.

In contrast, ABPT has been proposed as a promising alternative for managing PAL. This technique involves the intrapleural instillation of autologous blood with the aim of sealing the air leak, initially developed for PAL in post-operative pneumothorax. Several small-scale retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that ABPT can achieve cessation in 26% to 91% of cases, with some reports showing 71.7% to 84.0% of patients experiencing complete resolution within five days. Moreover, ABPT appears safe for repeated administration, with adverse events reported at incidences ranging from 0% to 16%. However, the heterogeneous outcomes likely reflect differences in blood dosage, timing of intervention, number of administrations, and varying definitions of PAL among studies.

Given the controversy and the limitations of existing evidence, a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing talc pleurodesis with ABPT is imperative. To achieve this, a pilot study is designed to rigorously address methodological weaknesses by standardising the timing of pleural interventions, employing a digital chest drain system for precise, quantitative measurement of air leak, and adopting unified criteria for treatment success.

Interventions

• Drug talc powder
  intrapleural instillation of talc slurry
• Biological patient's own venous blood
  intrapleural instillation of patient's own venous blood

Primary outcome measures

• Complete cessation of air leak within 5 days of study intervention [Time frame: 5 days]

Secondary outcome measures (10)

• Change in the average rate of air leak [Time frame: 5 days]
• Time to air leak cessation [Time frame: 30 days]
• Length of hospital stay [Time frame: 3 months]
• Recurrence of pneumothorax [Time frame: 3 months]
• Number of patients requiring additional intervention [Time frame: 3 months]
• Pain score [Time frame: 5 days]
• Breathlessness score [Time frame: 5 days]
• Adverse events [Time frame: 3 months]
• Spirometry parameter [Time frame: 3 months]
• 6-minute walking distance [Time frame: 3 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• Age 18 years or older
• Radiographically proven pneumothorax and underlying lung disease (either pre-existing or shown in diagnostic imaging at presentation)
• Spontaneous onset of pneumothorax, not related to trauma or iatrogenic procedure
• SSP with air leak persists for ≥3 days after the first radiographic evidence of pneumothorax
• Intend to administer talc or autologous blood patch therapy (ABPT) to stop the air leak as the next step of treatment

Exclusion criteria

• A chest drain size smaller than Fr 12
• Bilateral pneumothorax
• Impaired blood clotting, including baseline INR > 1.5, platelet < 150 x 10\^9/L, use of therapeutic dose anticoagulant or dual-antiplatelet agents
• Active or recent (within 6 weeks) pleural infection
• Septicaemia or active extrapleural infection (e.g. pneumonia)
• Use of long-term systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant
• Previously received talc or ABPT to the ipsilateral pleural space for the current episode of pneumothorax
• Known sensitivity to talc
• Has had a previous pneumonectomy (either on the same or contralateral side)
• Patients who are pregnant or lactating (females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before randomisation)
• Expected survival of less than three months from a different pathology to this pneumothorax (e.g. metastatic malignancy)
• Cognitively impaired and physically unable to follow the turning procedure during intrapleural procedure, or at risk of self-removing chest drain
• Inability to give informed consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation

Randomized

Model

Parallel assignment

Masking

Open label

Primary purpose

Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06883188 · STOP

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗