Menu
Recruiting NCT06875583

The Radiation ProtEction for Dose RedUction in the Cardiac CathEter Lab Study: The REDUCE Trial

No phase Interventional Radiation Exposure Radiation Exposure to Operator Radiation Injuries Radiation Safety

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Radiation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Radiation Exposure, Radiation Exposure to Operator, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Safety. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Doctors and nurses who perform heart procedures using X-ray guidance are exposed to radiation, which can be harmful over time. This exposure increases the risk of certain health problems, including cancers, eye damage (cataracts), and DNA damage. Although protective lead clothing is used to reduce exposure, it is heavy, uncomfortable, and can cause muscle and joint problems for those who wear it daily. A new radiation protection device, called RAMPART, may help reduce radiation exposure for heart specialists and their teams. It could also allow them to wear lighter protective gear-or none at all-making their work safer and more comfortable. This study will compare the radiation levels received by doctors and nurses during heart procedures when using RAMPART versus standard protection. By doing so, we hope to find out if this new device can better protect medical teams from radiation, improving both their safety and well-being.

Detailed description

Recent decades have seen major increases in x-ray guided procedures in interventional cardiology, radiology and vascular surgery. Exposure to ionising radiation is known to be an inherent risk and remains a serious and unresolved threat to the health of operators and their team. It is associated with an increased incidence of brain and blood cancers, cataracts, and recent mechanistic data indicates significantly increased DNA damage in those without leaded leg protection.

Although existing standard radiation protection measures somewhat reduces exposure, all cardiac catheter lab personnel still receive a certain dose of radiation and continue to accumulate lifetime exposure. Furthermore, leaded personal protective equipment is heavy, leads to orthopaedic complications, and detracts from operator comfort.

Novel radiation protection devices such as RAMPART may significantly reduce radiation doses to cardiac catheter lab personnel, and potentially allow the use of lighter lead, or no lead at all. In this study we aim to investigate if use of RAMPART significantly reduces radiation exposure, when compared with standard radiation protection. Standard coronary intervention procedures will be randomised to RAMPART or standard (radiation protection), and operators and Cath lab team doses will be compared.

Interventions

  • Device Radiation
    The use of RAMPART radiation protection device

Primary outcome measures

  • 1st Operator Eye radiation [Time frame: 1) Periprocedural 2) Cumulative dose - through study completion, an average of 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • 1st Operator Chest / Groind radiation [Time frame: 1) Periprocedural 2) Cumulative dose - through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • 2nd Operator Radiation - all levels [Time frame: 1) Periprocedural 2) Cumulative dose - through study completion, an average of 1 year]
  • 'Circulating Nurse' Radiation [Time frame: 1) Periprocedural 2) Cumulative dose - through study completion, an average of 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • All procedures involving adult patients (>18 year of age)
  • Male or female patients
  • Planned to undergo either an elective or urgent coronary intervention procedure involving ionising radiation in the cardiac catheter lab, via the right and or left radial arteries.

Exclusion criteria

  • Procedures involving patients less than 18 years of age
  • Patients unable to give valid consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Femoral approach procedure

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

United Kingdom · 1 center
  • Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital — Liverpool

Publications

  • Lisko JC, Shekiladze N, Chamoun J, Sheikh N, Rainer K, Wei J, Binongo J, Raj L, Byku I, Rinfret S, Devireddy C, Jaber WA, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros V, Steuterman S, Sandesara P, Nicholson WJ. Radiation Exposure Using Rampart vs Standard Lead Aprons and Shields During Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 19;3(1):101184. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101184. eColl PMID 39131978
  • Noor HA, Althawadi N, Noor Z, AlAnsari N, Chachar TS, Al Raisi S, Yousif N. Radiation Exposure During Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures: Portable Shielding System Versus Standard Lead Aprons. Cureus. 2024 Aug 29;16(8):e68108. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68108. eCollection 2024 Aug. PMID 39350833

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06875583 · REDUCE

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗