Menu
Recruiting NCT06875167

Semi-closed Loop Automated Insulin Therapy in the Pediatric Population Aged 2-6 Years With Type 1 Diabetes: Impact on Quality of Life and Glycemic Control

Observational Type 1 Diabetes Closed Loop Insulin Quality of Life

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Type 1 Diabetes, Closed Loop, Insulin, Quality of Life. Basic parameters: 2 years — 6 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing, with an incidence of +4% per year in France today. The treatment for type 1 diabetes is insulin therapy. In recent years, new systems have emerged, so-called "semi-closed loop" systems, also called automated insulin therapy, which have proven their superiority in terms of quality of life and glycemic balance in adults and children over 6 years old. Since January 24, 2024, the HAS now recognizes the indication of the semi-closed loop for the YPSOPUMP model in children aged 2 to 6 years. This is the first reimbursement in France of a closed loop system for the 2-6 year old age group. There are currently few studies comparing the quality of life of children in semi-closed loop versus other treatments (open loop or injections). Regarding quality of life, the studies found mainly concern the contribution for parents and the improvement of adolescents' sleep as in the study by Erin C Cobry et al from 2020 (6). Our study therefore aims to demonstrate an improvement in quality of life but also in diabetes balance in type 1 diabetic patients on a closed loop insulin pump versus open loop or injections in the pediatric population aged 2-6 years.

Primary outcome measures

  • An improvement in the score on the general quality of life questionnaire in pediatrics PedsQL 4.0 which will be evaluated before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, at 1 month and 6 months after the implementation of the semi-closed loop. [Time frame: the assessment of quality of life via the PedsQL 4.0 questionnaire will be evaluated before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, at 1 month and 6 months after the implementation of the semi-closed loop.]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Compare the glycemic balance of patients on automated insulin therapy versus other treatments (open loop or injections) via TIR (time in range or time within the target). [Time frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.]
  • Compare the glycemic balance of patients on automated insulin therapy versus other treatments (open loop or injections) via HbA1c. [Time frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.]
  • Compare the number of hypoglycemic episodes [Time frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.]
  • Compare time in hyperglycemia [Time frame: The evaluation of the secondary criteria is carried out before the implementation of the semi-closed loop, then at 1 month and 6 months after implementation.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • -Patients aged 2 to 6 years inclusive
  • Presenting type 1 diabetes on insulin therapy
  • Social security affiliates
  • Patient initiating semi-closed loop treatment
  • Family (at least one parent or representative of parental authority) agreeing to follow the training necessary for continuous measurement of glucose in real time.
  • collection of non-opposition from one of the two parents or the representative of parental authority agreement

Exclusion criteria

  • Opposition to participation in research involving humans or opposition to the use of data or samples and associated data (withdrawal of non-opposition).

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Fondation Lenval Hôpitaux pédiatrique Nice CHU Lenval — Nice

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06875167 · 24-HPNCL-07 Diablife

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗