Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06864559

Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study

No phase Interventional Wound Healing Complication Oral Surgery Third Molar Extraction Oral Infection

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Wound Healing Complication, Oral Surgery, Third Molar Extraction, Oral Infection. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Considering the wide variety of surgical sutures currently marketed in the field of Dentistry, it was decided to conduct a study comparing the microbial adhesion and antibacterial activity of three different types of sutures used in Oral Surgery (Silk, non-absorbable polyamide monofilament and non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).

Detailed description

The general or primary objective is:

• To compare 3 non-absorbable suture materials used in oral surgery: silk, polyamide monofilament and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

The specific or secondary objectives are:

* To evaluate how each type of suture influences wound healing and the patient's postoperative period. * To study bacterial colonization in each type of suture. * To determine the tissue reaction and clinical characteristics of each suture.

Interventions

  • Other To Compare 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery
    To compare bacterial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical characteristics such as wound healing and patient postoperative outcomes in 3 different suture materials used in oral surgery.

Primary outcome measures

  • Bacterial colonization [Time frame: 7 days.]
  • Level of inflammation [Time frame: 7 days.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with indication for extraction of a third lower molar retained in an unfavorable position that requires a bayonet incision in the surgical procedure.
  • Age: patients aged 18 years or older.
  • ASA I patients (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology, 1979): healthy patients who tolerate stress well, without systemic pathology, no anxiety and in whom a therapeutic modification is not necessary.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Smoking patients.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06864559 · 2028/CEIH/2021

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗