Menu
Enrolling by invitation NCT06853327

Oral Ketorolac for IUD Pain Reduction

Phase II Interventional IUD Insertion Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Ketorolac, Placebo.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: IUD Insertion Pain. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Timing of Oral Ketorolac for Pain Reduction in IUD Insertion: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

To determine if oral ketorolac given at different timepoints prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion influences pain experienced during this procedure.

Detailed description

This is a single-site prospective interventional randomized controlled trial to examine the timing of administration of ketorolac for IUD pain control. 108 patients will be recruited to the study and they will be randomized into three study arms in a 1:1:1 ratio. Information including demographics, medical history, and obstetric history will be collected during enrollment. Patients will arrive 3 hours prior to their IUD appointment. Study group "K2" will receive ketorolac 20mg per os (PO) at 2 hours prior to IUD insertion, then they will receive a placebo pill at 1 hour prior to IUD insertion. In contrast, study group "K1" will receive the inverse: they will be given a placebo pill at 2 hours prior to IUD insertion, then they will receive ketorolac 20mg PO at 1 hour prior to IUD insertion. Study group "K0" will receive placebo pills at both timepoints. The patients will then receive a standard IUD insertion by an OBGYN physician. Both patients and providers will be blinded to the study medications received. The standard pain control regimen for IUD insertion includes offering vaginal lidocaine gel self-administered 5 minutes prior to IUD insertion as well as offering lidocaine paracervical block (PCB). All patients will be offered these standard pain control methods including the "K0" group. Patients may utilize one, both, or neither of these offered interventions in addition to the randomized study medication. During the IUD insertion, pain scores at 7 different timepoints will be measured via a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a 100mm visual tool that allows patients to rate the pain they are experiencing at each time interval. The 7 timepoints include: pre-procedure, tenaculum placement, block injection, uterine sounding, IUD deployment, overall (measured immediately post-procedure), and 10 minutes post-procedure. Information on Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and patient satisfaction will be collected during their appointment. After the 10-minute post-procedure VAS score and questionnaire, patients will be discharged from the study.

Interventions

  • Drug Ketorolac
    The experimental condition to be examined by this study is the timing of administration of ketorolac prior to IUD insertion. Ketorolac 20mg PO has proven beneficial at certain timepoints during IUD insertion in prior studies, but pharmacokinetics indicate that it could require more time until peak analgesia.
  • Drug Placebo
    Placebo will be used to control the timing of administration and be used to compare ketorolac to baseline standard pain control regimens

Primary outcome measures

  • Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion [Time frame: All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Difference in mean VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion, controlling for parity [Time frame: Parity is recorded during intake 1 week prior to IUD. VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards]
  • Difference in rate of "severe pain" (VAS pain scores 70-100mm) between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion [Time frame: All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards]
  • Difference in rate of change of VAS pain scores between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion [Time frame: All VAS pain scores will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards]
  • Difference in rate of acceptable pain levels between study arms at 7 timepoints during and after IUD insertion [Time frame: All PASS responses will be measured during their IUD appointment. 5 timepoints will be measured during IUD insertion (~10 total minutes), 1 immediately after the procedure, 1 ten minutes afterwards]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Able to consent
  • Desires IUD insertion

Exclusion criteria

  • IUD placement under sedation or oral anxiolytic
  • IUD replacement (removal with insertion)
  • Daily narcotic or NSAID use
  • Contraindications to IUD placement
  • Current: pregnancy, genital/pelvic infection
  • Lifetime history: uterine anomaly, pelvic inflammatory disease, allergy to levonorgestrel or copper
  • Contraindications to ketorolac
  • Current: weight under 50 kilograms
  • Lifetime history: allergy to NSAIDs, liver disease, renal disease, peptic ulcer disease, cerebrovascular bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • University of North Carolina - Hillsborough Campus — Hillsborough

Publications

  • Crawford M, Davy S, Book N, Elliott JO, Arora A. Oral Ketorolac for Pain Relief During Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Dec;39(12):1143-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Aug 18. PMID 28826645
  • Ngo LL, Ward KK, Mody SK. Ketorolac for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000912. PMID 26241253
  • de Oliveira ECF, Baeta T, Brant APC, Silva-Filho A, Rocha ALL. Use of naproxen versus intracervical block for pain control during the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system insertion in young women: a multivariate analysis of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 29;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01521-z. PMID 34715839
  • Ngo LL, Braaten KP, Eichen E, Fortin J, Maurer R, Goldberg AB. Naproxen Sodium for Pain Control With Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1306-1313. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001746. PMID 27824753
  • Bednarek PH, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Cwiak C, Espey E, Jensen JT; Post-Aspiration IUD Randomization (PAIR) Study Trial Group. Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PMID 25487172
  • Reeves JA, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK. Intrauterine Device Training, Attitudes, and Practices Among U.S. Health Care Providers: Findings from a Nationwide Survey. Womens Health Issues. 2023 Jan-Feb;33(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 16. PMID 36123229
  • Akintomide H, Brima N, Sewell RD, Stephenson JM. Patients' experiences and providers' observations on pain during intrauterine device insertion. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2015;20(4):319-26. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1031885. Epub 2015 Apr 10. PMID 25857221
  • Rahman M, King C, Saikaly R, Sosa M, Sibaja K, Tran B, Tran S, Morello P, Yeon Seo S, Yeon Seo Y, Jacobs RJ. Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar. PMID 38586685

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06853327 · 24-2276

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗