Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06816745

Comparison of Physiological Effects of Two Types of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy in Tracheostomized Patients

No phase Interventional Critical Care Oxygen Therapy Tracheostomy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Modified high flow tracheal oxygen, Standard high flow tracheal oxygen.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Critical Care, Oxygen Therapy, Tracheostomy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of Physiological Effects of Standard and Modified High-Flow Oxygen Therapy in Tracheostomized Patients

Overview

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy offers benefits like precise oxygen delivery, flow-related positive end-expiratory pressure generation and improved lung function. High-flow oxygen therapy can be applied via tracheostomy as high-flow tracheal oxygen. While high-flow tracheal oxygen has been used to facilitate weaning, it has diminished physiological effects due to bypassing upper airways. To enhance its effectiveness, researchers developed a modified high-flow tracheal oxygen tube with a smaller expiratory end diameter to increase airway resistance and pressure. This is a prospective randomized crossover study that aims to compare the physiological effects of standard and modified high-flow oxygen therapy in tracheostomized patients.

Detailed description

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy has been shown to provide several physiological benefits, including precise control of the fraction of inspired oxygen, generation of flow-related positive end-expiratory pressure, increased end-expiratory lung volume, improved oxygenation, and enhanced carbon dioxide elimination. It has been widely utilized in managing acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and preventing hypoxemia after extubation.

High-flow oxygen therapy can be applied via tracheostomy as high-flow tracheal oxygen. Previous studies have reported successful cases of using high-flow tracheal oxygen to facilitate weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with restrictive and obstructive pulmonary disorders. However, compared to high-flow nasal oxygen, high-flow tracheal oxygen exhibits significantly diminished physiological effects due to the bypassing of the narrow nasopharynx, glottis, and upper airway, as well as a more open circuit.

To address this limitation, the investigators have developed a modified high-flow tracheal oxygen tube with a reduced expiratory end tube diameter. This modification aims to create higher expiratory resistance and airway pressure, thus simulating the physiological effects of high-flow nasal cannula. This is a prospective randomized crossover physiological trial designed to compare the effects of standard and modified high-flow oxygen therapy in tracheostomized patients. Key physiological parameters will be assessed, including airway pressure, end-expiratory lung volume, vital signs, oxygenation, and respiratory workload.

Interventions

  • Procedure Modified high flow tracheal oxygen
    Modified high-flow tracheal oxygen with flow rates of 40L/min and 60L/min will be performed.
  • Procedure Standard high flow tracheal oxygen
    Standard high-flow tracheal oxygen with flow rates of 40 L/min and 60 L/min will be performed.

Primary outcome measures

  • Mean expiratory airway pressure [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Positive end-expiratory pressure [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Change of end-expiatory lung volume [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • Respiratory rate [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Tidal volume [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • End-tidal carbon dioxide [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Pulse oxygen saturation [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Esophageal pressure-time product [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Tidal swing of esophageal pressure [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Respiratory muscle pressure [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]
  • Dynamic transpulmonary pressure [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 hours]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Tracheostomy with stable spontaneous breathing.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age younger than 18 years old
  • Pregnancy
  • Hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg, heart rate >140 or <60 bpm)
  • Respiratory and oxygenation instability (respiratory rate > 35bpm or oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry <90%)
  • Neuromuscular diseases or phrenic nerve injury
  • Recent trauma or surgery to the trachea, esophagus, neck, chest, or stomach
  • Pneumothorax or placement of a chest drainage
  • Contraindication to electrical impedance tomography (EIT) (implantable defibrillator)
  • Anticipating withdrawal of life support

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Beijing Shijitan Hospital — Beijing

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06816745 · IIT2024-158-002

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗