Menu
Recruiting NCT06815406

Recurrence Rate After Endoscopic Resection of , Laterally Spreading Tumor Granular Type (LST-G) of the Colon and Rectum: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

No phase Interventional Colorectal Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR), Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Colorectal Cancer. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Italy
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Recurrence Rate After Endoscopic Resection of , Laterally Spreading Tumor Granular Type (LST-G) of the Colon and Rectum: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ( ESD vs EMR )

Overview

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early-stage non-polypoid neoplastic lesions, particularly Laterally Spreading Tumors - Granular Type (LST-G) larger than 20mm, require effective endoscopic removal to prevent malignant progression. The two primary techniques for resecting these lesions are Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). EMR is a widely used, minimally invasive technique that involves resecting the lesion with a diathermic snare after submucosal injection. While effective and safe, EMR often necessitates piecemeal resection, increasing the risk of local recurrence. In contrast, ESD, developed in Asia, allows for en bloc resection regardless of lesion size, ensuring more accurate histopathological assessment and lower recurrence rates. However, ESD requires greater technical expertise, has longer procedural times, and carries a higher risk of complications. In Western clinical practice, EMR remains the standard treatment, whereas ESD is selectively performed in high-expertise centers. Given the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing EMR and ESD in Western populations, this study aims to provide robust clinical evidence to guide treatment decisions. The primary objective of this study is to compare the recurrence/residual adenomatous tissue rate at 6 and 12 months between EMR and ESD in patients with LST-G lesions of the colon and rectum

Interventions

  • Procedure Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR)
    atients assigned to this arm will undergo Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR), a standard endoscopic technique that involves the resection of colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors - Granular type (LST-G) using a diathermic snare with submucosal injection. The procedure may be performed en bloc or in a piecemeal fashion, depending on lesion size and characteristics. EMR is widely accepted for lesions with low submucosal invasion risk but has a higher recurrence rate than ESD.
  • Procedure Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)
    Patients assigned to this arm will undergo Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), an advanced endoscopic technique that allows for en bloc resection of large colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors - Granular type (LST-G). The procedure involves the use of specialized knives to dissect the submucosal layer, ensuring complete resection with histologically clear margins (R0 resection). ESD has been associated with lower recurrence rates but requires a high level of expertise, longer procedural time

Primary outcome measures

  • Recurrence/Adenomatous Residual Rate [Time frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Complete Resection Rate [Time frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment]
  • Differences in Procedure Time [Time frame: Up to 2 months]
  • Bleeding Rate [Time frame: During procedure (up to 2 months from enrollment) and 24 hours and 3 months after treatment]
  • Perforation Rate [Time frame: During procedure (up to 2 months from enrollment) and 24 hours and 3 months after treatment]
  • Overall Complication Rate [Time frame: 24 hours after treatment]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of Laterally Spreading Tumor - Granular Type (LST-G) ≥ 20 mm in the colon or rectum with an indication for endoscopic resection.
  • Life expectancy > 10 years.
  • Ability to understand and sign the informed consent form, demonstrating comprehension of the study and willingness to participate.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Laterally Spreading Tumor - Non-Granular Type (LST-NG).
  • Presence of depressed areas within the lesion.
  • Lesions located on a scar or anastomosis site.
  • Lesions classified as Kudo Vi or Vn pattern.
  • History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (e.g., ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease).
  • Diagnosis of hereditary polyposis syndromes (e.g., familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome).

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Italy · 5 centers
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna - Sant'Orsola Malpighi — Bologna
  • Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera — Genova
  • Università Vita Salute - IRCCS — Milan
  • Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara — Modena
  • Azienda USL IRCCS di Reggio Emilia — Reggio Emilia

Publications

  • Bogie RMM, Veldman MHJ, Snijders LARS, Winkens B, Kaltenbach T, Masclee AAM, Matsuda T, Rondagh EJA, Soetikno R, Tanaka S, Chiu HM, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S. Endoscopic subtypes of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) and the risk of submucosal invasion: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):263-282. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121144. Epub 2017 Nov 27. PMID 29179230
  • Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, Hosobe S, Kusaka H, Kobayashi T, Himori M, Yagyuu A. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Oct;47(10):880-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.10.880. PMID 7962600
  • Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y, Iishi H, Kudo SE, Ikematsu H, Igarashi M, Saitoh Y, Inoue Y, Kobayashi K, Hisabe T, Tsuruta O, Sano Y, Yamano H, Shimizu S, Yahagi N, Watanabe T, Nakamura H, Fujii T, Ishikawa H, Sugihara K; Colorectal Endoscopic Resection Standardization Implementation Working Group of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan. Local recurrence after endoscopi PMID 25848926
  • Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, Jover R, Langner C, Bronzwaer M, Nalankilli K, Fockens P, Hazzan R, Gralnek IM, Gschwantler M, Waldmann E, Jeschek P, Penz D, Heresbach D, Moons L, Lemmers A, Paraskeva K, Pohl J, Ponchon T, Regula J, Repici A, Rutter MD, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gas PMID 28212588
  • Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, Tominaga M, Ueno N, Inaba Y, Ito T, Moriichi K, Kohgo Y. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):583-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034. Epub 2015 Jan 13. PMID 25592748
  • Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, Brown G, Tam W, Singh R, Zanati S, Burgess NG, Sonson R, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015 Jan;64(1):57-65. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305516. Epub PMID 24986245
  • Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, Amato A, Berr F, Bhandari P, Bialek A, Conio M, Haringsma J, Langner C, Meisner S, Messmann H, Morino M, Neuhaus H, Piessevaux H, Rugge M, Saunders BP, Robaszkiewicz M, Seewald S, Kashin S, Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Deprez PH. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline PMID 26317585
  • Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Kudo SE, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Watanabe T, Saitoh Y, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T, Sugita A, Sugano K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015 May;27(4):417-434. doi: 10.1111/den.1 PMID 25652022

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06815406 · 104/2021/SPER/IRCCSRE

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗