The Aims of the Study Are to Translate the Index of Professional Governance (IPG 3.0) Into Italian and Validate It and to Assess the State of Professional Governance in an Italian Hospital (ISMETT)
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Validation Study. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
"Index of Professional Governance" Tool: a Multicentric Validation and Measuring Professional Governance in an Italian Hospital Setting
Overview
Professional Governance (PG) is a way to actualize better work environments and structural empowerment. PG has a history over many years in the healthcare industry and has been defined as multidimensional organizational characteristics that encompass the structure and processes through which professionals direct, control and regulate one another's goal-oriented efforts. Multiple studies over the years have shown that PG can lead to empowered personnel and quality of care delivered. In many organizations, governance is primarily controlled by management. The responsibility for managing professional practice should, however, be shared by staff and leaders, and in order to empower staff, they should be engaged in identifying areas for improvement. In addition, evidence-based practice should be enabled by allocating sufficient time, research and access to evidence sources. The participation element refers to who creates and participates in governance activities on different levels. Successful professional governance structures have been linked to a positive professional practice environment. An effective structure with true sharing of decision-making between management and personnel will also contribute to optimal patient outcomes. To evaluate whether an organization's governance is empowering and professional, it must be measured. Thus, various instruments to measure nurses' participation in professional governance have been presented. The Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) has been used in more than 250 international healthcare organizations during the last 20 years to evaluate implementation of their management models. Hess created the IPNG for measuring professional governance along a conceptual continuum from traditional, through shared to self-governance models. Hess has since continued to advance the questionnaire. At the same time, an extended tool was created with all professional figures involved, the so called "Index of Professional Governance" (IPG). Several revisions have been made over time up to the current version of the IPG 3.0 The IPG measures the governance of hospital-based professional, based on a model of governance derived from the literature, in 5 dimensions: personnel, information, resources, participation and practice. Those five dimensions are covered by 50 items. Respondents use a 5-point scale to identify the group that dominates certain areas of governance stated in the items, ranging from 'management/administration only' (1p), through 'equally shared by staff and management/administration' (3p) to 'staff only' (5p). The points for each dimension, and overall governance, are then organized together, analyzed and used to place the organization's governance on the continuum from traditional to self-governance. Previously translated from its original language, English-American into Arabic, British, Finnish, French, German, Korean, Portuguese, it is structured in five dimensions: staff, information, resources, participation and practice. These 5 dimensions are analyzed in 50 items. Aims of the study: 1. To translate the Index of Professional Governance (IPG 3.0) into Italian and validate it; 2. To assess the state of professional governance in an Italian hospital (ISMETT).
Primary outcome measures
- Inter-rater agreement percentage in evaluating the conceptual equivalence of the italian translation of the IPG. [Time frame: Feb-Mar 2025: Recruitment of evaluators and assessment of language proficiency. Apr-Sep 2025: Evaluation of the proposed and collection of evaluators' judgements and final approval of the translated items. Oct 2025: Final data analysis and study closure.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- 1 year of professional seniority
- possess adequate linguistic skills certified by passing an English test (prepared by the linguistic services of the promoting center).
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06814639 · IRRB/37/23