Menu
Recruiting NCT06809348

Development of PRECISE: A Data Driven Personalized Suicide Prevention Intervention

No phase Interventional Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: PRECISE.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Individuals at high-risk of suicide vary substantially from one another. Over time, risk factors for suicide may change within the same individual. Despite these differences, most treatments for suicidal thoughts assume that the same intervention works equally well for all individuals at high-risk of suicide. Intensive longitudinal data combined with network science, integrated with coaching, could be used to personalize suicide prevention interventions to make them more effective and efficient. This K23 Career Development application involves refining and testing a novel personalized treatment for individuals at high-risk called PeRsonalizEd Clinical Intervention for Suicidal Events or PRECISE. PRECISE leverages idiographic statistical techniques adopted from network science applied to ecological momentary assessment data to inform the tailoring of Safety Planning and skills from Dialectical Behavior Therapy, two existing evidence-based treatments for suicide. In Aim 1, a user-centered design approach will be used to refine PRECISE. Following the refinement of the intervention, informed by data from a case series in Aim 1, the investigators will then conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing two different intensities of personalization. In the low-intensity arm, the 8-week treatment will be tailored based on an initial two-week burst of ecological momentary assessment and one idiographic model. In the high-intensity arm, participants complete eight weeks of ecological momentary assessment and idiographic models are generated between each session. Coaches use the idiographic models to identify an individuals' drivers of suicidal thoughts and conduct behavioral chain analyses to tailor specific skills to then teach, shape, and reinforce in their individual clients. Assessments are completed pre-treatment, 8-weeks post-enrollment, and 16-weeks enrollment. The investigators hypothesize that both arms will demonstrate clinically significant reductions in suicidal ideation, but the high-intensity arm will be superior to the low-intensity arm in reducing ideation. Furthermore, the investigators anticipate that increases in effective emotion regulation skills and reductions in negative affect will account for the decrease in suicidal ideation. As individuals learn more effective emotion regulation strategies, they will experience less distress and thereby lower levels of suicidal ideation. This project is responsive to Objective 3.2 of the NIMH Strategic Plan and is integrated with a mentored research training plan focused on 1) suicide specific rigorous clinical trials, 2) user centered design in digital health, and 3) applications of network science to intensive longitudinal data. The project and training goal will support the Candidate's overarching goal to become a clinician-scientist engaged in independent research on personalized, impactful, rapid acting suicide prevention interventions for at risk adults.

Interventions

  • Behavioral PRECISE
    PRECISE includes aspects of several evidence-based approaches, such as Safety Planning and DBT to manage and reduce suicide risk. During the initial visit, staff train participants how to complete EMAs. Participants then complete two weeks of five-times per day EMAs regarding their emotions, emotion regulation strategies as well as SITBs. Following an initial "learning period", participant data is analyzed via GIMME to determine the within-person correlates of SITBs. Data is processed through a

Primary outcome measures

  • Scale for Suicide Ideation [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up assessment at 6-months.]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Emotion Reactivity Scale [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up assessment at 6-months.]
  • Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire [Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the follow-up assessment at 6-months.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-65 years old
  • Endorsement of active suicidal ideation on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (>2 or past month thoughts of killing self or attempt in past month)
  • English fluency
  • Willingness to provide contact information for a key information to be contacted as part of our risk and safety plan.

Exclusion criteria

  • Past year exposure to DBT
  • Moderate/severe substance use disorder within the past thirty days
  • Dementia, mild cognitive impairment and/or traumatic brain injury
  • Lack of capacity to consent to research and/or under conservatorship.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • 8980 Villa La Jolla Drive — San Diego

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06809348 · 811796

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗