Promoting Communication in Minimally Verbal Autistic Children with Social Robot
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: NAO-Assisted Therapy, Standard therapeutic.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Autism Spectrum Disorder. Basic parameters: 4 years — 12 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Italy
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Promoting Communicative Initiative in Minimally Verbal Autistic Children Through Interaction with the Humanoid Social Robot
Overview
Minimally verbal (MV) children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) face significant challenges in communication and social interaction, which are fundamental to learning and development. Current therapeutic approaches, such as speech therapy and augmentative communication systems, often have variable efficacy due to engagement and responsiveness challenges. This pilot study investigates using of the humanoid robot NAO as part of a rehabilitative program designed for MV children with ASD. NAO, with its predictable and engaging interaction style, is hypothesized to enhance communicative initiative, expressive communication, and social interaction in this population. The study employs a randomized controlled trial design, assigning participants to either an NAO-assisted intervention group or a control group receiving standard therapy. Outcomes will be assessed using standardized measures of communication, social interaction, and observational data. This research aims to explore the potential of social robots as an innovative tool to addressing the unique needs of MV children with ASD, contributing to the development of effective, accessible therapeutic options that improve their quality of life and that of their families.
Detailed description
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in social communication and restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities. Among individuals with ASD, approximately 25-30% are minimally verbal (MV), demonstrating limited verbal or non-verbal communication skills, which poses significant challenges for social interaction and learning. Early diagnosis and tailored therapeutic interventions are crucial for improving long-term outcomes in this population. However, traditional therapies often face limitations, including variability in efficacy and difficulty maintaining engagement among MV children. In recent years, the integration of advanced technologies into therapeutic programs has gained traction as an innovative approach to address communication challenges in ASD. Social robots, such as the humanoid robot NAO, offer unique opportunities to engage children with ASD through consistent and predictable interactions. NAO is equipped with capabilities including speech recognition, gestures, and responses to touch and movement, making it an effective tool for promoting communication and social behaviors. Preliminary studies suggest that social robots can enhance engagement and improve social skills in children with ASD, yet their potential remains underexplored in minimally verbal children. This single-blind, randomized, controlled study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a rehabilitative treatment program integrating the NAO robot for minimally verbal children with ASD. NAO-assisted therapy sessions are designed to promote communicative initiative, expressive language, and social interaction through interactive tasks tailored to each child's needs.
The study's outcomes will be measured using standardized communication assessments, including the Test of Verbalization (TVL), and observational data to evaluate engagement, responsiveness, and frequency of communicative behaviors. By leveraging advanced robotic technology, this study aims to explore new avenues for therapeutic interventions, ultimately contributing to the development of evidence-based strategies that improve the quality of life for minimally verbal children with ASD and their families.
Interventions
- Behavioral NAO-Assisted Therapy
The intervention sessions included tasks designed to engage the child in verbal and social interactions, such as naming objects, responding to questions, and performing gestures. The NAO robot provided consistent and predictable feedback, while therapists supported and reinforced appropriate communicative behaviors. - Behavioral Standard therapeutic
Standard therapeutic approaches included exercises aimed at improving verbal communication and social engagement, such as naming objects, sentence construction, and comprehension tasks. Therapists adapted the intervention to the child's individual communication goals.
Primary outcome measures
- Language Development Level Test (TVL) [Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(3months)]
- The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) [Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(3months)]
- Quality of Life in Autism Questionnaire (QoLA) [Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(3months)]
- Repetitive Behavior Scale (RBS) [Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(3months)]
- Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(3months)]
- Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) [Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(3months)]
- Mand Requests During Sessions [Time frame: During Sessions]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
- Minimal verbal communication
- Age between 4 and 12 years.
Exclusion criteria
- Presence of severe intellectual disability.
- Diagnosis of neurological disorders other than ASD.
- Significant medical conditions that could interfere with study participation.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Italy · 1 center
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo — Messina
Publications
- Hodges H, Fealko C, Soares N. Autism spectrum disorder: definition, epidemiology, causes, and clinical evaluation. Transl Pediatr. 2020 Feb;9(Suppl 1):S55-S65. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.09.09. PMID 32206584
- Rose V, Trembath D, Keen D, Paynter J. The proportion of minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder in a community-based early intervention programme. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 May;60(5):464-77. doi: 10.1111/jir.12284. PMID 27120989
- Brignell A, Chenausky KV, Song H, Zhu J, Suo C, Morgan AT. Communication interventions for autism spectrum disorder in minimally verbal children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 5;11(11):CD012324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012324.pub2. PMID 30395694
- Korneder J, Louie WG, Pawluk CM, Abbas I, Brys M, Rooney F. Robot-mediated interventions for teaching children with ASD: A new intraverbal skill. Assist Technol. 2022 Nov 2;34(6):707-716. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1930284. Epub 2021 May 28. PMID 33983864
- Salimi Z, Jenabi E, Bashirian S. Are social robots ready yet to be used in care and therapy of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Oct;129:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 20. PMID 33862066
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06805916 · NAO01