Menu
Recruiting NCT06804421

Diagnosis and Treatment of Late Neurological Ischemic Deficit in Patients Suffering From Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Observational Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage, Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Italy
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Late Neurological Ischemic Deficit in Patients Suffering From Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Diagnosis and Treatment

Overview

Recent studies state that patients affected by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) today survive longer because they are treated early. Unfortunately, patients often develop chronic disabling neurological deficits at a rate that is still unacceptable given the progress in the specific treatment of this pathology and the volume of systems of neurological monitoring available to date in Italy. The main cause of unfavorable neurological outcome is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), often resulting from symptomatic vasospasm defined as delayed neurological ischemic deficit (DIND). The incidence of DIND is not defined and is difficult to diagnose early as there is no gold standard for identifying it, nor guidelines regarding the most effective treatment. Given these gaps, the primary objective of this study is to describe the incidence of DIND in patients affected by aSAH, collecting information regarding the diagnostic imaging (neurological symptom on clinical examination or alteration on instrumental monitoring). Secondary objectives will be to evaluate the different therapeutic strategies adopted in the different participating centers and compare these strategies to mortality and short- and long-term functional neurological outcome. Furthermore, as there are no data in the literature, the Investigators want to describe the indications, usefulness and intensity of treatment in the aSAH patient in case of monitoring of parenchymal intracranial pressure.

Detailed description

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a particular form of hemorrhagic stroke characterized by blood spillage into the intracranial subarachnoid spaces due to the rupture of an aneurysm of a large cerebral arterial vessel of the circle of Willis. It can cause sudden and intense symptoms, such as violent headache, nausea, vomiting, neck stiffness and sensitivity to light, but also loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest and death.

The pre-hospital mortality rate in the literature remains high (22-26%), even if it is lower than in previous decades. However, the number of patients discharged from hospital with permanent disabilities is increasing, especially those of working age (the average age at onset of symptoms is 55 years), contributing significantly to public health costs.

The incidence of aSAH worldwide is approximately 6.1 cases per 100,000 people per year, but there are national differences. In Italy, for example, it is 11.2 (10.5-12.4) cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year.

At the onset of symptoms, once the aneurysmal origin of the cerebral hemorrhage has been confirmed through radiological examinations, it is essential to promptly ensure treatment of the ruptured aneurysm. Early repair of the ruptured aneurysm is recommended within 24 to 72 hours, via endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping. This allows to prevent any rebleeding and reduce the risk of cerebral vasospasm, as it reduces the amount of blood distributed in the subarachnoid space. The latter, in fact, represents the main inflammatory stimulus on large cerebral arteries, favoring the vasoconstriction reaction which manifests itself angiographically and/or ultrasonographically in 70% of cases. Cerebral vasospasm is very often clinically silent, since the reduction of the vascular lumen is not sufficient to generate the conditions of discrepancy between the arterial flow of the perfused brain parenchyma and its metabolic demand.

However, in 20-30% of cases a neurological deterioration also occurs, called delayed ischemic neurological deficit or DIND (Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit), defined as a focal neurological deterioration (appearance of at least one of the symptoms including hemiparesis, aphasia, hemianopsia or neglect) or global (sudden neurological worsening leading to at least a two-point decrease in the Glasgow Scale or the appearance of anisocoria or pupillary reactivity). DIND is not always immediately evident after securing the aneurysm, and it is necessary to exclude other causes of neurological deterioration, such as hydrocephalus, convulsions, rebleeding and hyponatremia in order to confirm it.

Identifying DIND early is essential to prevent the formation of a true ischemic core in the area affected by vasospasm, i.e. late cerebral ischemia, DCI (Delayed Cerebral Ischemia), defined by radiological criteria: evidence of cerebral infarction on brain computed tomography (CT) scan or brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 6 weeks of onset of aSAH complicated by vasospasm.

DIND, in fact, is the main preventable cause of unfavorable neurological-functional outcome and DCI in patients with SAH.

Regarding the identification of DIND, it is certainly crucial to carry out a systematic clinical neurological examination on the awake patient. In comatose patients, or in those in whom it is not possible to carry out a sedation window, multimodal instrumental monitoring is certainly helpful. In fact, if the patient is sedated or cannot be awakened, the information deriving from the inspection (pupillary reactivity and isocoria) should be integrated with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring (cEEG) and/or transcranial color Doppler ultrasound (TCD)ccc. Instrumental monitoring is, in fact, fundamental in those patients in whom a suspension of sedation generates an increase in intracranial pressure and consequent reduction in cerebral oxygenation, making clinical neurological evaluation impossible.

The alterations associated with DIND most commonly described during quantitative EEG (qEEG) are decreased alpha/delta ratio and reduced alpha variability. EEG changes may precede clinical deterioration by several hours, and allow for a differential diagnosis with nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Instrumental vasospasm is defined as an average blood flow velocity \> 120 cm/sec detected ultrasonographically via TCD. Instead, clinical vasospasm, i.e. DIND that requires treatment, is diagnosed in case of speed of at least 200 cm/sec, or increased by 50 cm/sec in the last 24 hours, or even if the Lindeegard index is greater of 3 (defined as the ratio of flow velocities between the middle cerebral artery and the ipsilateral distal internal carotid artery, MCA/ICA).

Regarding second-level tests, in sedated or unconscious patients, it is also reasonable to perform screening through repeated imaging tests, such as computed perfusion tomography (CTP), cerebral angiotomography (CTA) and intracranial vessel angiography ( TSA). The use of CTP is increasingly widespread: it detects imminent ischemia by decreasing cerebral perfusion, thus identifying salvageable brain tissue (ischemic penumbra) before irreversible brain damage occurs. This approach, however, involves transporting the critically ill patient to radiology and administering a contrast medium, adding considerable risks. It should also be underlined that, in case of clinical or instrumental suspicion of DIND, in some centers second level tests are used less and less, intervening early with therapy to resolve it.

As with the diagnostic procedure, the therapeutic strategies implemented are also very different from each other, and none has been proven to be more effective than another. They can be more or less invasive, and the main ones are:

* hemodynamic therapy, i.e. permissive hypertension, in which systemic blood pressure is increased to increase cerebral perfusion and ensure that an adequate quantity of blood supplies the brain parenchyma downstream of vasospasm; * local intra-arterial pharmacological therapy, in bolus or continuous infusion, with a vasodilator drug (calcium antagonist/milrinone); * mechanical therapy, whereby action is taken on the muscular wall of the vessel in question by carrying out angioplasty with a transluminal balloon.

Innovative techniques, such as stent retriever angioplasty, which also allows the application of intra-arterial calcium channel antagonists, can be an additional tool in selected patients with refractory vasospasm.

To date, there is no gold standard for diagnosing DIND, evidence on which patients are at greatest risk of developing it and recommendations regarding the most effective treatment to resolve it. Management is delegated to the multidisciplinary department team of each centre.

In conclusion, also in light of the recent guidelines on aSAH, it is urgent to establish how to prevent DCI, identifying the onset of DIND early, both clinically and instrumentally.

With this study the Investoigators aim to determine the incidence of DIND in patients with aSAH, to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments and to compare the different diagnostic/therapeutic strategies in the participating centers, investigating the impact of DIND on short-term and long-term neurological-functional outcomes.

Primary outcome measures

  • DIND incidence [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Imaging application [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Neurological-functional outcome assessment [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Neurological-functional outcome assessment [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Neurological-functional outcome assessment [Time frame: 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Primary diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to rupture of a cerebral artery aneurysm confirmed by cerebral angiotomography or angiography of the intracranial vessels, with the need for admission to the Intensive Care Unit
  • Signing the Informed Consent form to participate in the study according to current local regulations.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 years
  • Primary diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage sine materia, i.e. post-traumatic or caused by arteriovenous malformation or bleeding from a brain tumor.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Italy · 33 centers
  • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII — Bergamo
  • IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche — Bologna
  • ASST Spedali Civili — Brescia
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza — Brescia
  • ASST Lariana Ospedale Sant'Anna — San Fermo della Battaglia
  • ASST Cremona — Cremona
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi — Florence
  • IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino — Genova
  • … and 25 more centers

Publications

  • Su YS, Ali MS, Pukenas BA, Favilla CG, Zanaty M, Hasan DM, Kung DK. Novel Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm Using Solitaire Stent Retriever-Assisted Angioplasty: Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;135:e657-e663. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.097. Epub 2019 Dec 24. PMID 31881345
  • Rass V, Helbok R. How to diagnose delayed cerebral ischaemia and symptomatic vasospasm and prevent cerebral infarction in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Apr 1;27(2):103-114. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000798. PMID 33405414
  • Yamaki VN, Cavalcanti DD, Figueiredo EG. Delayed Ischemic Neurologic Deficit after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):641-647. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_15_19. PMID 31497080
  • Vergouwen MD, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Muizelaar JP, Mendelow AD, Juvela S, Yonas H, Terbrugge KG, Macdonald RL, Diringer MN, Broderick JP, Dreier JP, Roos YB. Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(1 PMID 20798370
  • Wilson CD, Shankar JJ. Diagnosing Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: CTA and CTP. Can J Neurol Sci. 2014 May;41(3):314-9. doi: 10.1017/s031716710001725x. PMID 24718816
  • Wahood W, Rizvi AA, Alexander AY, Yolcu YU, Lanzino G, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA. Trends in Admissions and Outcomes for Treatment of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the United States. Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01476-5. Epub 2022 Mar 18. PMID 35304707
  • Krishnamurthi RV, Ikeda T, Feigin VL. Global, Regional and Country-Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171-179. doi: 10.1159/000506396. Epub 2020 Feb 20. PMID 32079017
  • Claassen J, Park S. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2022 Sep 10;400(10355):846-862. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00938-2. Epub 2022 Aug 16. PMID 35985353

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06804421 · DINTESA (4533)

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗