Menu
Recruiting NCT06788093

Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics With Decision Support

No phase Interventional Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Pneumonia Asthma Bronchiolitis, Viral

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: ED Clinical Decision Support (CDS-ED), Transitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS-Tr).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, Pneumonia, Asthma, Bronchiolitis, Viral. Basic parameters: 6 months — 17 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics With Decision Support in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

Overview

Eliminating inappropriate antibiotic use in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is the central focus of this research. LRTIs (pneumonia, bronchiolitis, and infection-related exacerbations of asthma) account for nearly one-third of all emergency department (ED) visits and 40% of all infection-related hospitalizations in US children. LRTIs also account for more antibiotic use in children's hospitals than any other condition, despite most LRTIs being viral in nature. Inappropriate antibiotics are associated with substantial adverse effects. Accordingly, national guidelines strongly discourage routine antibiotic use for bronchiolitis and acute asthma and argue for significantly reducing antibiotic exposure (initiation, spectrum, and duration) in pneumonia. To address the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use, hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are now common nationwide, and these programs have demonstrated effectiveness in some hospital settings. Unfortunately, traditional ASP approaches do not translate well to the fast-paced and unpredictable ED environment, and hospital-based ASP resources are finite and not always immediately available. Clinical decision support (CDS) embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) is a strategy that could address the ED antibiotic stewardship gap. Informed by a deep understanding of the key facilitators and barriers to using CDS to support appropriate antibiotic use in ED and hospital settings, the investigators have developed two stewardship-focused CDS interventions for pediatric LRTI. The overarching goal of this research is to rigorously evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these CDS tools, alone and in combination, against usual care only in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial at 3 U.S. children's hospitals.

Detailed description

This is a usual care-controlled superiority clinical trial platform designed to evaluate the effects of hospital-based CDS in the ED (CDS-ED) and after transitioning to the hospital setting (CDS-TR) on antibiotic prescribing and related clinical outcomes for child and adolescent LRTI encounters at 3 U.S. children's hospitals. The investigators hypothesize that both interventions will be superior to usual care and, among patients presenting in the ED and subsequently admitted to the hospital, the combined interventions (CDS-ED + CDS-TR) will be most effective overall. Randomization will occur sequentially in two stages corresponding to the ED CDS and Transitions CDS populations. The first stage of randomization will allocate qualifying ED encounters 1:1 to CDS-ED vs. usual care alone in the ED. The second stage of randomization will allocate participants requiring hospitalization (those discharged from the hospital are not eligible) 1:1 to CDS-TR vs. usual care at the time of admission. To minimize bias, the trial will be embedded within clinical care with minimal exclusions and disruption to usual care activities. Investigators will be blinded to study arm assignment, though blinding of treating clinicians is not possible due to the nature of the study. The trial will also evaluate process and implementation outcomes throughout the study period within the platform population. A formal interim analysis is not planned.

Interventions

  • Behavioral ED Clinical Decision Support (CDS-ED)
    The ED-CDS intervention is designed as a discrete decision support aid to influence initial antibiotic decision-making in the ED. This intervention will feature a clinician-facing LRTI dashboard for end-users that assimilates relevant clinical data (e.g., vital signs, select diagnostic tests, links to reference information) and offers tailored suggestions for antibiotic initiation, related diagnostic testing, and in those receiving antibiotics, preferred options and alternatives for antibiotic c
  • Behavioral Transitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS-Tr)
    The CDS-Tr intervention is designed as a longitudinal decision support aid to influence initial and ongoing (i.e., continuation, discontinuation, escalation, or de-escalation) antibiotic decision-making in the hospital setting. This intervention will also feature the LRTI dashboard along with additional tailored suggestions and recommendations for antibiotic decision-making upon hospital admission, and for those receiving antibiotics, at the time of discharge. Additionally, CDS-Tr will be active

Primary outcome measures

  • Primary Effectiveness: 10-day Longitudinal Antimicrobial Spectrum Index [Time frame: 10 days]
  • Primary Safety: Proportion of Participants Experiencing Escalation in Treatment [Time frame: 10 days]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • Effectiveness: Proportion of Participants Experiencing Reduction of ASI Score [Time frame: 10 days]
  • Effectiveness: Total Treatment Duration [Time frame: 42 days]
  • Effectiveness: ASI per Exposure Day [Time frame: 10 days]
  • Safety: Need for Intensive Care [Time frame: 42 days]
  • Safety: Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Shock Requiring Vasoactive Medications [Time frame: 42 days]
  • Safety: 3- and 14-day ED Reutilization [Time frame: 14 days]
  • Safety: 3- and 14-day Hospital Reutilization [Time frame: 14 days]
  • Death within 14 days of index discharge [Time frame: 14 days]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • ED encounter or admission to an inpatient hospital team.
  • EHR-based positive screen for suspected LRTI, defined as a qualifying chief complaint (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, etc.), plus triage documentation of abnormal respiratory effort and/or cough.

Exclusion Criteria: None

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Sequential
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Health services research

Study locations

United States · 3 centers
  • Benioff Children's Hospital - Oakland — Oakland
  • Benioff Children's Hospital - San Francisco — San Francisco
  • Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt — Nashville

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06788093 · 240854 · R01HS029331

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗