Performance of the Electroretinogram, Performed and Interpreted by an Advanced Practice Nurse, in the Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy.
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Electroretinogram.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Diabetic Retinopathy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- France
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-age individuals. Early screening for DR is a public health issue. The gold standard is fundoscopy interpreted by an ophthalmologist. In France, in 2020, it was estimated that one-third of diabetic patients had not seen an ophthalmologist in over two years. Recently, a portable electroretinogram (ERG), which provides a physiological and non-invasive assessment of retinal cell function, has been developed. It combines pupillary responses through an infrared-sensitive camera, the implicit time and the response amplitude to brief white light stimuli. The result is expressed as an overall score (DR score), considered abnormal if it is \< 7 or \> 23.4. The sensitivity of the ERG for screening diabetic retinopathy is estimated at 80%, and its specificity at 82%, compared to conventional imaging. Additionally, it has been shown that poor glycemic control is associated with an increase in implicit time in preclinical DR. This test could therefore detect earlier changes than imaging results. To date, it is not considered the gold standard in France. The investigators aim to test this hypothesis. The investigators propose a prospective, bi-center study to evaluate the performance of the ERG, performed and interpreted by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN), compared to the gold standard of retinal imaging (retinography) interpreted remotely by an ophthalmologist.
Detailed description
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-age individuals. Early screening for DR is a public health issue. The gold standard is fundoscopy interpreted by an ophthalmologist. In France, in 2020, it was estimated that one-third of diabetic patients had not seen an ophthalmologist in over two years. Recently, a portable electroretinogram (ERG), which provides a physiological and non-invasive assessment of retinal cell function, has been developed. It combines pupillary responses through an infrared-sensitive camera, the implicit time and the response amplitude to brief white light stimuli. The result is expressed as an overall score (DR score), considered abnormal if it is \< 7 or \> 23.4. The sensitivity of the ERG for screening diabetic retinopathy is estimated at 80%, and its specificity at 82%, compared to conventional imaging. Additionally, it has been shown that poor glycemic control is associated with an increase in implicit time in preclinical DR. This test could therefore detect earlier changes than imaging results. To date, it is not considered the gold standard in France. The investigators aim to test this hypothesis. The investigators propose a prospective, bi-center study to evaluate the performance of the ERG, performed and interpreted by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN), compared to the gold standard of retinal imaging (retinography) interpreted remotely by an ophthalmologist.
The investigators' study will prospectively include adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and without know DR. These patients are followed in both study centers and both examinations (ERG and retinography) will be performed during the hospitalization for the evaluation of their diabetes and complications. Sensitivity and specificity of the ERG performed and interpreted by an APN will be compared to gold standard.
Interventions
- Device Electroretinogram
Electroretinogram (RETevalTM devices, LKC Technologies) performed and interpreted by an advanced practice nurse compared to the gold standard (retinography) interpreted by an ophthalmologist
Primary outcome measures
- Sensitivity of the electroretinogram [Time frame: during the patient's hospitalization, an average of 1 week]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the ERG [Time frame: during the patient's hospitalization, an average of 1 week]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients > 18 years old
- With type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
- No known diabetic retinopathy
- Affiliated to a social security system
- Attending the hospitals of Reims or Charleville Mézières in France during a hospitalization for the evaluation of their diabetes and complications
Exclusion criteria
- Known diabetic retinopathy
- Ongoing pregnancy or within 3 months postpartum
- Recent cataract surgery (< 3 months)
- Photosensitive epilepsy
- Patients under legal protection
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
Study locations
France · 1 center
- Damien JOLLY — Reims
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06782997 · PR25001