Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06773247

Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Versus Dry Cupping in Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain

No phase Interventional Non-specific Low Back Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: I. Myofascial Release Technique ,Cupping Technique and II. Conventional Physical Therapy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Non-specific Low Back Pain. Basic parameters: 45 years — 55 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effectiveness of Myofascial Release Technique Versus Dry Cupping Therapy in Management of Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Overview

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the differences between the effect of myofascial release technique versus cupping technique on pain intensity level, spinal mobility and functional disabilities level in patients with NSLBP. Methods: The study participants were 60 patients from both genders diagnosed as NSLBP. Their age ranged from 45 to 55 years old. They were assigned randomly into two groups: Group A (MFR): 20 patients received MFR and conventional physical therapy treatment. Group B: 20 patients received cupping technique and conventional physical therapy treatment. Group C: 20 patients received conventional physical therapy treatment only. All groups received treatment protocols three times a week for 4 consecutive weeks.

Detailed description

The study participants were assigned randomly into two groups; Group A: 20 patients received MFR and conventional physical therapy treatment (therapeutic exercises in the form of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. Group B: 20 patients received cupping technique and conventional physical therapy treatment (therapeutic exercises in form of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. Group C: 20 patients received conventional physical therapy treatment only (therapeutic exercises in form of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. All groups received treatment protocols three times a week for 4 consecutive weeks.

Intervention I. Myofascial Release Technique Vertical stroking technique was performed in lumbar region to quadratus lumborum. Activities like sustained repetitive movements, twisting, bending, sedentary posture for prolonged duration, muscle imbalance, etc. leads to trigger point formation making quadratus lumborum as a common source of low back pain. It was performed as follow; Quadratus lumborum is palpated in prone and side lying for trigger points. The technique is applied by the patient positioned in side lying with a pillow under waist to exaggerate stretch of the muscle. The therapist stands at level of patient's hip posterior and counter pressure was applied by one hand on the ribs in a cephalic direction and with the other hand vertical stroking was performed by the knuckles caudally through its course in direction of the barrier. When a barrier was reached, light pressure was maintained to stretch the barrier and wait for approximately 3-5 minutes. Prior to release, a therapeutic pulse was felt (e.g. heat). As the barrier releases, the hand felt the motion and softening of the tissue. Sessions were conducted three days / week every other day for four weeks Cupping Technique The cupping procedure was performed as follows: Massage oil was applied over the area first to improve contact and makes it easier to move the cup's position. double-walled glass cups (6 glasses with diameters from 75 to 100 mm) were held inverted, after which each glass was placed on an afflicted area overlying the low back muscle (acupoint: BL23. This point is located 1.5 cm lateral to the posterior midline, on the level of the lower border of the spinous process of the second lumbar vertebra) and has been used to treat conditions such as lower back pain. As the air inside the cups cooled, vacuums were created, drawing up the skin within each cup. The cups were separated by 1-2 centimeters. The glasses were removed after 10 to 20 minutes depending on the colour of the circular so-called cupping marks, which range from slightly rose to dark pink. During cupping, the patients were asked to remain as still as possible. If the suctioning became too painful to bear, the cups were removed before the full time had elapsed.

II. Conventional Physical Therapy Treatment It consists of stretching exercises for the back, iliopsoas, and hamstring muscles and strengthening exercises for the abdominal muscles for 30 minutes. Three sets of stretching exercises, each involving a 30-sec hold and 30 sec of rest repeated three times, were performed in three sessions per week over four weeks. One set of strengthening exercises, consisting of 10 repetitions with a 5-sec hold, sessions were conducted three days a week, every other day, for four weeks.

The cupping procedure was performed as follows: Massage oil was applied over the area first to improve contact and makes it easier to move the cup's position. double-walled glass cups (6 glasses with diameters from 75 to 100 mm) were held inverted, after which each glass was placed on an afflicted area overlying the low back muscle (acupoint: BL23. This point is located 1.5 cm lateral to the posterior midline, on the level of the lower border of the spinous process of the second lumbar vertebra) and has been used to treat conditions such as lower back pain. As the air inside the cups cooled, vacuums were created, drawing up the skin within each cup. The cups were separated by 1-2 centimeters. The glasses were removed after 10 to 20 minutes depending on the colour of the circular so-called cupping marks, which range from slightly rose to dark pink. During cupping, the patients were asked to remain as still as possible. If the suctioning became too painful to bear, the cups were removed before the full time has elapsed. Cupping therapy was performed for 15-20 minutes three days / week every other day for four weeks

Interventions

  • Other I. Myofascial Release Technique ,Cupping Technique and II. Conventional Physical Therapy
    The cupping procedure was performed as follows: Massage oil was applied over the area first to improve contact and makes it easier to move the cup's position. double-walled glass cups (6 glasses with diameters from 75 to 100 mm) were held inverted, after which each glass was placed on an afflicted area overlying the low back muscle (acupoint: BL23). Myofascial Release Technique Vertical stroking technique was performed in lumbar region to quadratus lumborum. AIt was performed as follow; Quadrat

Primary outcome measures

  • pain in low back area [Time frame: 4 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Functional Disability [Time frame: 4 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • patients age ranged from 45 to 55 years old and body mass index of 18.5-24.9 (kg/m2) with NSLBP of 3 or more month's duration.
  • All patients reported pain score of 4-6 based on the visual analog scale (VAS). 3.Patient with limitation in range of motion of lumbar spine due to tightness of the muscles, hypersensitive tender points on palpation along with pain localized para spinally .

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients presented with lumbar radiculopathy
  • spinal pathology (fracture or tumors) or history of any spinal surgery
  • lumbar canal stenosis, osteoporosis
  • pregnancy related back pain, and spinal deformities like scoliosis or kyphosis.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. — Cairo

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06773247 · (P.T. REC/012/005495)

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗