Menu
Recruiting NCT06767150

StrAtegies For Zoledronic Acid Post-dEnosumab Discontinuation in Postmenopausal oSTeoporosis

Phase IV Interventional Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: a second infusion of ZOL when crosslaps levels reach 300 pg/mL, a rescue second infusion at month-12 (standard traitment).
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Denosumab (Dmab) is a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, its withdrawal is associated with a rebound phenomenon associated with an unexpected increased risk of vertebral fractures. Defining the optimal strategy for Dmab withdrawal is critically needed. Investigator propose an open-label randomized superiority strategy trial to compare the 1-year lumbar densitometric efficacy of biomarkers-driven zoledronate (ZOL) infusion vs standardized ZOL treatment to mitigate rebound phenomenon.

Detailed description

Denosumab (Dmab) is a potent and validated treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, its withdrawal, especially after reaching therapeutic target, is associated with a rebound phenomenon characterized by: (i) an increase in bone turnover markers levels usually within first 6 months off-treatment, (ii) a decrease in BMD, and (iii) an unexpected increased risk of (multiple) vertebral fractures. Although current experts' recommendations propose a post-Dmab bisphosphonates therapy (such as ZOL) to mitigate rebound phenomenon, the optimal strategy is still matter of debate. Data suggesting a protective effect with bisphosphonates (1 infusion of ZOL or weekly alendronate) are scarce, with discrepancies, and highlight that a substantial proportion of patients experiences rebound-related bone loss despite bisphosphonate therapy. Crosslaps, a bone turnover maker, are available for daily clinical practice and reflect the antiresorptive activity of anti-resorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates. Investigator hypothesize that monitoring crosslaps levels, can help to identify patients requiring more intensive bisphosphonate (additional ZOL infusion) therapy to control the post-Dmab rebound phenomenon.

Investigator propose to compare 2 strategies for Dmab withdrawal in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a standard treatment control group treated with a single ZOL infusion versus a biomarker-guided ZOL group with an additional ZOL infusion in case of insufficient inhibition of bone resorption according to crosslaps.

Interventions

  • Drug a second infusion of ZOL when crosslaps levels reach 300 pg/mL
    a first infusion of ZOL 5 mg, 6 months after denosumab withdrawal (= study start) and a second infusion when crosslaps levels reach 300 pg/mL, no later than month-12
  • Drug a rescue second infusion at month-12 (standard traitment)
    a first infusion of ZOL 5 mg, 6 months after denosumab withdrawal (= study start), and potentially a rescue second infusion at month-12, in case unfavourable outcome (incident osteoporotic fractures) or high risk of unfavourable outcome

Primary outcome measures

  • Maintain lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of ZOL [Time frame: 1 year after inclusion]
Secondary outcome measures (7)
  • Maintain hip bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of ZOL [Time frame: 1 year after inclusion]
  • the changes in hip and lumbar BMD from baseline [Time frame: Day 0, 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion]
  • the changes from baseline in bone turnover markers [Time frame: 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion]
  • morphometric vertebral fractures [Time frame: 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion]
  • Patients requiring a second ZOL [Time frame: 1 year after inclusion, 2 year after inclusion]
  • Relation between biomarker values and densitometry evolution [Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months after inclusion]
  • Relation between biomarker values and appearance of new vertebral fracture [Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months after inclusion]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with post-menopausal osteoporosis
  • And treated with denosumab for at least 2 years and reaching decision of denosumab withdrawal because of achieved therapeutic target defined as no fracture during treatment; no new risk factors; no BMD decrease > 0.03 g/cm² at the spine or hip;
  • And with a history of severe fracture or a femoral or lumbar T-score ≤ -2.5 prior denosumab initiation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Dmab use for bone disease other than post-menopausal osteoporosis.
  • Uncontrolled endocrine diseases. Liver failure.
  • Use of medication affecting bone metabolism during the last year, including bisphosphonates, teriparatide, romosozumab, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, breast cancer hormonotherapy, glucocorticoids over 5 mg/day.
  • Contra-indication to bisphosphonates according to license recommendation including chronic kidney disease with GFR stage > or = G3b. Prior intolerance to zoledronic acid.
  • Subjects unable to give an informed consent or to fill the case report form. Subjects under law protection.
  • Foreseeable poor compliance with the strategy, alcoholism, toxicomania.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

France · 17 centers
  • Amiens Hospital — Amiens
  • Bordeaux Hospital — Bordeaux
  • Cahors Hospital — Cahors
  • Dax Hospital — Dax
  • Le Mans Hospital — Le Mans
  • Lille Hospital — Lille
  • Limoges Hospital — Limoges
  • Marseille Hsopital — Marseille
  • … and 9 more centers

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06767150 · RC31/23/0370

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗