Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural for Labour Analgesia in Primigravida
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: epidural set.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Labor Pain. Basic parameters: 18 years — 40 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Technique for Labour Analgesia in Primigravida;Comparative Randomized Double Blinded Study
Overview
This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) technique versus the Conventional Epidural (CE) technique for labor analgesia in primigravida.
Detailed description
The conventional epidural (CE) technique has been the gold standard for decades, providing continuous and adjustable pain relief during labor. However, the advent of new techniques, such as the Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) technique, has led to ongoing research and debate over which method offers superior outcomes in terms of efficacy, onset of analgesia, maternal satisfaction, and safety.
The CE technique involves the placement of an epidural catheter into the epidural space, where local anesthetics and adjunctive drugs are administered to provide pain relief. While this technique is highly effective, it is not without limitations. Some parturients may experience a slow onset of analgesia, uneven drug distribution, or the need for frequent catheter adjustments, which can delay adequate pain relief and decrease maternal satisfaction . Furthermore, the CE technique has been associated with potential complications such as unilateral blocks, inadequate sacral analgesia, and the necessity for higher doses of local anesthetics, which may increase the risk of motor blockade and impact labor progression .
In contrast, the DPE technique is a novel approach that modifies the CE by incorporating an intentional dural puncture with a small-gauge spinal needle without administering intrathecal drugs. This modification is believed to facilitate the spread of epidurally administered drugs into the subarachnoid space, potentially enhancing the onset and quality of analgesia. The DPE technique aims to combine the benefits of both the CE and the Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE) techniques while minimizing their respective drawbacks, such as the hemodynamic instability associated with CSE and the slower onset of analgesia often seen with CE
Interventions
- Device epidural set
The epidural space will be identified at either the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace using the loss of resistance technique with an 18 Gauge Epidural needle.A test dose of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine will be administered to each participant to rule out intravascular or intrathecal placement of the catheter. This ensures the proper placement of the catheter before the full dose of analgesia is administered.Following the test dose, an initial bolus of 8 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine combined with 2 μ
Primary outcome measures
- onset of analgesia [Time frame: 1 year]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Primigravida women aged 18-40 years.
- Gestational age between 37 and 42 weeks.
- Single pregnancy with vertex presentation.
- Patients in active labor with cervical dilation of less than 5 cm at the time of epidural placement.
- American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I or II.
- Patients who provide informed consent for participation in the study.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection at the puncture site).
- History of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or any other significant medical conditions that could influence labor or anesthesia outcomes.
- Patients with a history of previous uterine surgery, including cesarean section.
- Known fetal anomalies or non- vertex presentations.
- Patients with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m²).
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetic-s used in the study.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798. PMID 28067707
- Gunaydin B, Erel S. How neuraxial labor analgesia differs by approach: dural puncture epidural as a novel option. J Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(1):125-130. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2564-y. Epub 2018 Oct 6. PMID 30293143
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06766812 · Soh_Med__24_12_03Ms