Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06751316

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of MTA Pulpotomy Versus Conventional Pulpectomy in Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis

No phase Interventional Decayed Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Conventional Pulpectomy, MTA Pulpotomy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Decayed Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis. Basic parameters: 4 years — 7 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of MTA Pulpotomy Versus Conventional Pulpectomy in Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

This study is designed to compare between MTA Pulpotomy (Removal of coronal pulp tissue, placing MTA and covering with Stainless steel crown) Versus Conventional Pulpectomy (Removal of radicular pulp tissue, placing Zinc Oxide/Eugenol and covering with Stainless steel crown) in irreversible pulpitis in primary second molars.

Interventions

  • Procedure Conventional Pulpectomy
    Removal of radicular pulp tissue, placing Zinc Oxide/Eugenol and covered by stainless steel crown
  • Procedure MTA Pulpotomy
    Removal of coronal pulp tissue, placing MTA and covered by stainless steel crown

Primary outcome measures

  • • rate of clinical success [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • • rate of radiographic success [Time frame: 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients:
  • Aged 4-7 years, cooperative, in good general health and medically within normal
  • Teeth:
  • Restorable mandibular second primary molars.
  • History of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Preoperative radiograph:
  • Absence of periapical or inter-radicular radiolucency.
  • Absence of widening of periodontal ligaments (PDL) space.
  • Absence of internal or external root resorption.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients:
  • With systemic disorders.
  • Physical or mental disabilities.
  • Unable to attend follow- up visits.
  • Refusal of Participation.
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent.
  • Teeth:
  • Previously accessed teeth.
  • Mobile mandibular second primary molar.
  • Swelling in the vestibule or on palpation.
  • Pain on percussion.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Cairo University — Cairo

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06751316 · Pulpotomy Versus Pulpectomy

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗