Menu
Recruiting NCT06751303

Patient Preferences for Precision Medicine: Determining Optimal Patient Quality of Life Using PARPi's

No phase Interventional Ovarian Cancer Quality of Life

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Patients that are HRP are given a decision aid for PARPi use.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Ovarian Cancer, Quality of Life. Basic parameters: No limits · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Canada
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Patient Preferences for Precision Medicine

Overview

Patients with ovarian cancer with defective DNA repair mechanisms derive substantial benefit from PARP inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy. Both niraparib and olaparib are effective inhibitors of PARP, which exploit already defective DNA repair mechanisms (e.g., via BRCA mutations), particularly those with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). These two PARPis have notably different toxicity profiles, with niraparib showing many more severe side effects. In this Ovarian Cancer Canada funded study, we will implement perform HRD testing for ovarian cancer patients in Saskatchewan with response to platinum-based chemotherapy. This information will provide personalized and precision estimates about the amount of benefit that can be expected from taking a PARPi. We will evaluate both treatment outcomes and quality of life in a real-world study setting, to inform future decision-making regarding efficacy, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of PARPi therapy, specifically for niraparib. We hypothesize that for patients who are homologous recombinant proficient (HRP), the median 32.7-month incremental benefit (in delaying cancer progression) from taking a PARPi (niraparib is the only PARPi approved in this setting) will not be seen as being value-add when balanced by the decreased quality of life that accompanies the first 6-12 weeks of therapy. We also hypothesize that for women who are HRP, that PARPi therapy will not be cost-efficient.

Interventions

  • Other Patients that are HRP are given a decision aid for PARPi use
    Study created patient decision aid if the first for HRD tested Ovarian Cancer patients

Primary outcome measures

  • Patient decision for use of PARPi therapy [Time frame: 6 Monhs]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Known or suspected stage 3/4 high grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer Able to provide oral consent and complete questionnaires in English as per study protocol

Exclusion criteria

  • Ineligible for Maintenace PARPi therapy Refusal to undergo HRD testing

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Diagnostic

Study locations

Canada · 1 center
  • Saskatchewan Cancer Center — Saskatoon

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06751303 · 4118

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗