Effect of MET With and Without MCTE in Mechanical Neck Pain
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: METs, MCTE along with METs.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Mechanical Neck Pain. Basic parameters: 20 years — 50 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Pakistan
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Effects of Muscle Energy Techniques With and Without Motor Control Therapeutic Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain.
Overview
Work had to be done previously on METs and MCTE techniques, but no study has compared both techniques together to make it more comprehensible. The rationale of this will be to find out the combined effect of motor control therapeutic exercises and muscle energy technique for the treatment of pain, range of motion and disability associated with mechanical neck pain. This study will be effective for the clinicians to treat patients of mechanical neck pain.
Detailed description
Therapeutic exercises and manual therapy were shown to be useful in managing pain and lowering disability in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP). However, little studies investigated the benefits of muscle energy technique and motor control therapeutics exercise on mechanical neck pain (MNP). The current research fulfill this gap by comparing the short and long term benefits of muscle energy technique with and without motor control therapeutic exercises (MCTE) with the grail of determining best approach for lowering pain and disability in mechanical neck pain patients.
Interventions
- Other METs
* Hot pack for 10 minutes. * Neck isometrics with 10 second hold. * Each series of neck isometrics strengthening exercises had three movements including cervical flexion, cervical extension and cervical side flexion. * Muscle energy technique protocol: The individual was in a position of supine. The therapist was at the edge of bed, near the participants head. the therapist positioned the joint at the point of beginning range of motion resistance when performing a given movement. When the therap - Other MCTE along with METs
▪ Hot pack for 10 minutes. * Neck isometrics with 10 second hold. * Each series of neck isometrics strengthening exercises had three movements including cervical flexion, cervical extension and cervical side flexion. * After it was treated with motor control therapeutic exercises together with muscle energy technique. Motor control therapeutic exercises included cranio-cervical flexor exercises, cranio-cervical extensor exercises, co contraction of flexor and extensor and synergy exercise for s
Primary outcome measures
- Numeric pain scale rating [Time frame: 4th week]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
- Neck disability index [Time frame: 4th week]
- ROM cervical spine (flexion) [Time frame: 4th week]
- ROM cervical spine (Extension) [Time frame: 4th week]
- ROM cervical spine (Side flexion) [Time frame: 4th week]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- • Subjects were between 20 and 50 years old.
- Pain in cervical or neck region with no radiating pain in one or both upper limbs.
- Pain minimum of 3 months.
- Neck disability index (NDI) score of should be at least 10%.
- Forward head posture.
Exclusion criteria
- • Neck pain associated with vertigo.
- Irradiated neck pain.
- Vertebral fracture.
- Osteoporosis.
- Previous neck injury.
- Red flags (night pain, severe muscle loss, loss of involuntary control.
- Subjects with difficulty in communication or understanding.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Pakistan · 1 center
- Riphah college of rehabilitation and allied health sciences — Lahore
Publications
- Letafatkar A, Rabiei P, Alamooti G, Bertozzi L, Farivar N, Afshari M. Effect of therapeutic exercise routine on pain, disability, posture, and health status in dentists with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Apr;93(3):281-290. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01480-x. Epub 2019 Oct 25. PMID 31654125
- Bernal-Utrera C, Gonzalez-Gerez JJ, Anarte-Lazo E, Rodriguez-Blanco C. Manual therapy versus therapeutic exercise in non-specific chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jul 28;21(1):682. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04610-w. PMID 32723399
- Martin-Gomez C, Sestelo-Diaz R, Carrillo-Sanjuan V, Navarro-Santana MJ, Bardon-Romero J, Plaza-Manzano G. Motor control using cranio-cervical flexion exercises versus other treatments for non-specific chronic neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Jul;42:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 20. PMID 31030111
- Parikh P, Santaguida P, Macdermid J, Gross A, Eshtiaghi A. Comparison of CPG's for the diagnosis, prognosis and management of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 14;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2441-3. PMID 30764789
- Hidalgo B, Hall T, Bossert J, Dugeny A, Cagnie B, Pitance L. The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for treating non-specific neck pain: A systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1149-1169. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169615. PMID 28826164
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06750211 · REC/RCR & AHS/24/0115