Not yet recruiting NCT06746974
Comparing the Effects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Splinting in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Shockwave, Splint.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Trigger Finger, Shockwave Therapy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The goal of this study is to compare the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and splinting in the treatment of trigger finger. Participants will: Be randomized into two groups (shockwave group and splint group). Visit the clinic once a week for four weeks for therapy. Keep a diary of their symptoms, which will be reviewed at six weeks.
Interventions
- Device Shockwave
In the Shockwave group, will be applied focused shockwaves therapy of 1500 impulses at 0.01 mJ/mm2 over the painful area or the pathologic flexor tendon to each participant under the supervision of a physiatrist. The ESWT will be conducted once weekly for 4 weeks with a sham splint (DIP joint blocking splints) for at least 8 hours per day for 6 weeks. - Device Splint
In the splinting group, will be provided a PIP blocking splint at least 8 hours per day for 6 weeks with the sham shockwave (the patients close their eyes, extend their hand through a partition, apply shockwave device head with gel on the patient's finger, and play a mobile phone sound that mimics the sound of a real shockwave machine) once a week for 4 weeks.
Primary outcome measures
- 100-mm. horizontal VAS score [Time frame: at enrollment, fourth week, and sixth week after first intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- QuickDASH score [Time frame: at enrollment, fourth week, and sixth week after first intervention]
- Number of triggering [Time frame: at enrollment, fourth week, and sixth week after first intervention]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients age ≥ 18 years
- Grade I-III trigger finger patients (patients who has the presence of tenderness over the A1 pulley or painful locking or triggering as they fixed and extended the finger)
- Patients who consented to participation in the study
Exclusion criteria
- Trigger thumb
- The patients who had received previous treatment (steroid injection, ESWT or surgical release)
- Patients with local infections, malignancies, severe coagulopathy and pregnancy
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Yildirim P, Gultekin A, Yildirim A, Karahan AY, Tok F. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus corticosteroid injection in the treatment of trigger finger: a randomized controlled study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Nov;41(9):977-983. doi: 10.1177/1753193415622733. Epub 2016 Sep 28. PMID 26763271
- Nadar MS. Orthosis vs. exercise for the treatment of adult idiopathic trigger fingers: A randomized clinical trial. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Dec 1;48(6):713-719. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000294. Epub 2023 Oct 20. PMID 37870373
- Teo SH, Ng DCL, Wong YKY. Effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint-blocking orthosis vs metacarpophalangeal joint-blocking orthosis in trigger digit management: A randomized clinical trial. J Hand Ther. 2019 Oct-Dec;32(4):444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Jul 18. PMID 30030005
- Chen YP, Lin CY, Kuo YJ, Lee OK. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2083-2090.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 21. PMID 34029555
- Vahdatpour B, Momeni F, Tahmasebi A, Taheri P. The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Trigger Finger. Open Access J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 9;11:85-91. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S232727. eCollection 2020. PMID 32210646
- Gil JA, Hresko AM, Weiss AC. Current Concepts in the Management of Trigger Finger in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug 1;28(15):e642-e650. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00614. PMID 32732655
- Tarbhai K, Hannah S, von Schroeder HP. Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Feb;37(2):243-9, 249.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.038. Epub 2011 Dec 20. PMID 22189188
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06746974 · MURA2024/819