Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating the Shared Medical Decision Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Tumor response monitoring program, Standard evaluation of tumor response, Shared decision-making, Decision-making according to national recommendations.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Rectal Cancer. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- France
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Implementation of a Tumor Response Assessment Program Integrating Shared Medical Decision Making Into the Organ Preservation Strategy for Rectal Cancer Patients: Phase III Randomized - Multicenter
Overview
The adoption of total mesorectal excision (TME) has standardized rectal cancer surgery and improved oncological outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radio chemotherapy (NACRT) has further improved oncological benefit. Although these strategies result in good 5-year disease-free survival rates, they are associated with significant morbidity, in particular permanent long-term bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction. In rectal cancer management, the main objective of organ preservation is to avoid or reduce morbidity and impact on quality of life after rectal resection, without compromising oncological outcomes. The aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a defined response monitoring program, including a shared decision process, as a strategy for assessing tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. This is a national, phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial comparing the tumor response monitoring program with shared decision-making, versus standard tumor response assessment in organ preservation strategies in rectal cancer.
Interventions
- Other Tumor response monitoring program
three steps of tumor response evaluation (STEP 1 at 2 months, STEP 2 at 4 months, STEP 3 at 6 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment): STEP 1: digital rectal examination, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan STEP 2: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy STEP 3: DRE, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP or PET scan - Other Standard evaluation of tumor response
Assessment at 2 months (+/- 7 days) after neoadjuvant treatment: digital rectal exam, pelvic MRI, rectoscopy, TAP scan - Other Shared decision-making
At each stage of the monitoring program and depending on the clinical and oncological results, the decision to preserve the rectum will be discussed with the patient according to a shared-decision program. - Other Decision-making according to national recommendations
The decision to preserve the rectum is based on assessment at 2 months after completion of neoadjuvant treatment (standard of care since the GRECCAR2 trial). - Other Follow-up
Every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for the third year
Primary outcome measures
- Organ preservation rate [Time frame: 2 years after the start of neoadjuvant treatment]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patient aged 18 to 80
- Histologically proven lieberkuhnian adenocarcinoma with MSS status ;
- Patient who has or is due to receive neoadjuvant treatment (4 to 6 courses of (m)FOLFIRINOX or FOLFOX chemotherapy + CAP 50 radiochemotherapy or CAP 50 radiochemotherapy alone);
- BEFORE any neoadjuvant treatment:
- Tumor classified T2T3 (on MRI)
- N0-N1 (≤ 3 positive lymph nodes \* or size ≤ 8 mm) (on MRI)
- \* positive node = node size > 5 mm minor axis and/or morphologically suspicious appearance Tumor size ≤4 cm (ON MRI)
- No distant metastasis (M0)\_ TAP scan or PET scan
- ≤ 8 cm from anal margin (On MRI) (Clinical examination\*)
\*if the clinical examination is not possible, then the source data is that of the MRI.
- No invasion of the anal canal and/or sphincters (internal and external) (On MRI)
- Operable patient
- Ability to comply with the protocol and follow-up appointments (repeated assessment consultations and close follow-up if randomized to the Experimental Group);
- Person affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme;
- Free and informed consent signed by the patient.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with a history of chemotherapy or pelvic irradiation (excluding neoadjuvant treatment)
- Contraindication to pelvic MRI
- Patients with MSI status undergoing immunotherapy
- Other concomitant cancer or history of cancer within 5 years, with the exception of carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma or any other carcinoma in situ, considered cured
- Women who are pregnant, likely to become pregnant, or who are breast-feeding;
- Person under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice, or person deprived of liberty.
- Unable to undergo medical follow-up for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Other
Study locations
France · 1 center
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne — Dijon
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06740357 · DROUILLARD PHRCK 2023-2