Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06710171

Filling Gaps in the HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Cascade Through Counseling

No phase Interventional Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Counseling Sexual and Gender Minorities

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Counseling, List of resources.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), Counseling, Sexual and Gender Minorities. Basic parameters: from 19 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Canada
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Filling Gaps in the PrEP Cascade: User-centered Counseling About HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Linkage to Care for Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men

Overview

This study s objective is to test the acceptability and feasibility of a guide to facilitate counseling about HIV prevention, focusing on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). PrEP is a medication taken by HIV-negative persons to avoid an HIV infection. Healthcare providers (including but not limited to physicians and nurses) who see gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBM) will be randomly assigned to completing a short online training versus continuing their usual activities. The online training consists of modules containing brief information about PrEP, and about how to address concerns and difficulties that GBM face to get PrEP and to take care of their sexual health. The investigators will ask healthcare providers to answer questionnaires before and after the research activities take place, and a member of the research team will interview some of them at the end. Every time a healthcare provider has a counseling session with a GBM, they will facilitate putting a research coordinator in touch with the person receiving the counseling. Those GBM will also be asked to fill out questionnaires. These activities will take place in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Detailed description

Our research questions are: (1) Is a training program for PrEP acceptable for healthcare providers, measured by perceived advantage of applying the recommendations learned in the program, compared to current practice? (2) Is a training program for PrEP feasible for healthcare providers, measured by intention to continue applying the recommendations after the study conclusion? And (3) What is the anticipated effectiveness of a training program at increasing the proportion of PrEP-eligible GBM and TGNC who start PrEP within one month of a counseling session with a healthcare provider, compared to passive referral to existing resources?

In this open-label cluster randomized pilot trial, the investigators will randomize consenting providers to undergo an online self-paced training on brief user-centered PrEP counseling vs only receiving a list of available resources. The goal is to enroll a range of different healthcare provider types working in both urban and suburban settings, and in different work settings. Recruitment of user-participants will be facilitated by participating providers, but done by a research coordinator.

Randomization and inclusion of provider-participants is expected to start in October 2024 and will continue through February 2025. Data collection (questionnaires and interviews) will continue beyond that period for provider-participants, as well as for user-participants whose enrolment occurs during the specified recruitment dates.

The qualitative component will explore implementation considerations from the perspective of provider-participants. The investigators will do focus groups (of approximately one hour, variable size) and offer the possibility of doing individuals interviews (of approximately 30-45 minutes) if they cannot attend the focus groups.

In the analysis stage, counts and proportions will be used to describe categorical and dichotomous variables. Mean and standard deviations or median and interquartile range will be used to describe continuous normally and non-normally distributed variables respectively. For the anticipated effectiveness outcome, the intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) among patient-participants will be calculated. For that purpose, our analysis will be a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with logit link to estimate the effect of using the training program on the probability of user-participants starting (or re-starting) PrEP, while accounting for clustering of user-participants within the respective providers.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Counseling
    The intervention consists of using a theory-informed approach to user-centered brief counselling about PrEP uptake, designed specifically to help busy front-line providers in public health, sexual health and primary care settings advance clients along the PrEP cascade (specifically, supporting clients who meet evidence-based criteria for PrEP in accepting provider recommendations to use it) and provide linkage to care for related conditions. The intervention will be delivered to GBM through par
  • Other List of resources
    This list includes webpages which contain generic information about GBMs sexual health, PrEP, mental health, information about province-wide info lines for the general public about sexual health and/or educational resources for providers.

Primary outcome measures

  • Acceptability [Time frame: At the 3-month follow up of participating healthcare providers. Contextual information will be obtained using qualitative interviews (to take place within a month after the 3-month follow up)]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Feasibility - trialability [Time frame: At the 3-month follow up of participating healthcare providers. Contextual information will be obtained from of qualitative interviews, which will take place within one month after the 3-month follow up.]
  • Feasibility - complexity [Time frame: At the 3-month follow up of participating healthcare providers. Contextual information will be obtained from of qualitative interviews, which will take place within one month after the 3-month follow up.]
  • Feasibility - recruitment [Time frame: Measured at baseline]
  • Feasibility - retention [Time frame: At the 3-month follow up of participating healthcare providers]
  • Anticipated effectiveness [Time frame: At the patient level, after each counseling session and at the 1 month follow up]

Eligibility criteria

Eligible participants at the provider level ('provider-participants') will be nurses, nurse practitioners, counselors and physicians working at sexual health clinics, public health clinics and primary care practices, with or without experience giving PrEP counseling.

1A. Inclusion criteria for provider-participants:

  • For practicing health-care professionals, hold a valid license to practice in Ontario (this includes resident physicians)
  • Anticipate encountering a minimum of five PrEP-eligible GBM and TGNC eligible for PrEP in the three months after enrolling in the study

1B. Exclusion criteria for provider-participants

  • Anticipate to stop working at their current practice site before the end of the study

2A. Inclusion criteria for user-participants

  • Be \> 19 years of age
  • Self-identify as a gender different from cisgender woman
  • Be presenting to their provider for sexual health/HIV testing or any other services
  • Not having used PrEP in the three months prior to enrollment
  • Having clinical indication for PrEP as per the Canadian PrEP guideline (i.e.: -
  • Report having condomless anal sex with a man in the preceding 6 months plus any of the following: syphilis in the past year, rectal gonorrhea, LGV or chlamydia in the past year, use of PEP at least twice, ongoing sexual relationship with a person living with HIV with detectable viral load, or HIRI-MSM score \> 11 if available).

2B. Exclusion criteria for user-participants

  • User-participants who have already received an invitation to participate in the study and declined will not be included since that means they would have received the intervention or the control in the past.
  • Users who request getting on PrEP due to high self-perceived risk despite not meeting the clinical criteria specified above, will not be included.
  • Not being able to communicate in English

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

Canada · 1 center
  • Options Lab — Toronto

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06710171 · 23-177 · EFP-1129-BNG

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗