Menu
Recruiting NCT06707857

Effects of TNT on Pain, ROM and Disability in Patients With RC Tendinopathy

No phase Interventional Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: tendon neuroplastic training, conventional training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effects of Tendon Neuroplastic Training on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Overview

EFFECTS OF TENDON NEUROPLASTIC TRAINING ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION AND DISABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH ROTATOR CUFF TENDINOPATHY

Detailed description

Rotator cuff tendinopathy is a condition where the shoulder's tendon suffers small tears or inflammation, often causing pain frequently arises from repetitive overuse or the natural aging process Regular overhead activities can aggravate the shoulder's wear and tear, leading to tendinosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the impact of tendon neuroplastic training with standard treatments on pain levels, functional disability, and the range of motion in patients suffering from rotator cuff tendinopathy. Data were collected from Riphah rehabilitation clinic Lahore. Nprs , goinmeter and Spadi questioner were used before and after the intervention. Assessment was done through the tool before and after the treatment.

Interventions

  • Other tendon neuroplastic training
    Throughout the training, participants pain, range of motion and disability were monitored and they were asked to report any discomfort or unusual sign.
  • Other conventional training
    Throughout the training, participants pain, range of motion and disability were monitored and they were asked to report any discomfort or unusual sign.

Primary outcome measures

  • Numeric pain rate scale (NPRS) [Time frame: 6 weeks]
  • Shoulder pain and disability index (spadi) [Time frame: 6 weeks]
  • Universal Goniometer (UG) [Time frame: 6 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a current shoulder complaint lasting at least three months prior to the time of enrollment
  • Pain is located in the proximal lateral aspect of the upper arm (C5 dermatome)
  • Positive Hawkins-Kennedy test

Exclusion criteria

  • Bilateral shoulder pain
  • Less than 90 degrees of active elevation of the arm
  • Corticosteroid injection within the last six weeks
  • Radiologically verified fracture
  • Glenohumeral osteoarthritis
  • Surgery or dislocation of the affected shoulder
  • Symptomatic arthritis in the Ac joint
  • Frozen shoulder
  • Symptoms derived from the cervical spine

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • Riphah Rehabilitation clinic — Lahore

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06707857 · REC/RCR & AHS/24/0111

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗