Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06707298

Role of MDCT in Grading of Esophageal Varices

Observational MDCT Esoghageal Varices

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: MDCT Esoghageal Varices. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

The Role of Multidetector Computed Tomography(MDCT) in Grading of Oesophageal Varices in Cirrhotic Patients in Comparison to Endoscopy

Overview

Esophageal varices are one of the major complications of liver cirrhosis.Accurate grading of these varices is essential for effective management . Traditionally, esophagogastroduodenoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing and grading esophageal varices,Multi detector computed tomography (MDCT) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative for evaluating esophageal varices.it particularly appealing for patients who contraindicated to endoscopy .

Detailed description

Esophageal varices are one of the major complications of liver cirrhosis, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 80% with decompensated patients and 50% in compensated cirrhosis, pose a significant risk of life-threatening of bleeding due to portal hypertension. Accurate grading of these varices is essential for effective management . Traditionally, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the gold standard for diagnosing and grading esophageal varices . IT provides direct visualization, allowing for detailed assessment of variceal size and other risk factors for bleeding . However, it is an invasive procedure that requires sedation and carries some risks, such as bleeding or perforation .

Multi detector computed tomography (MDCT) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative for evaluating esophageal varices. It offers detailed cross-sectional images and is widely available, providing a broader assessment of abdominal pathology. Its non-invasive nature makes it particularly appealing for patients who contraindicated to endoscopy .

Primary outcome measures

  • Comparison between CT and endscopy in esophageal varices [Time frame: Baseline]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Assessment other complication of varicesand cirrhosis in CT [Time frame: Baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

-Cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension undergoing upper GI endoscopy.

Exclusion criteria

-Contraindication to contrast:( severe renal insufficiency, allergy to contrast agents).

-Previous history of upper GI endoscopy with intervention (band ligation or sclerotherapy).-

  • Pregnancy.
  • Patients with previous transjagular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
  • Patients with contraindication to endoscopy (severe cardiopulmonary conditions, coma "unless the patient is intubated", and cardiac arrhythmias)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Kumar R, Nandolia KK, Sharma P, Bhadoria AS, Chauhan U, Patnaik I, Saxena S. Computed tomography virtual oesophagography for the grading of oesophageal varices in cirrhotic liver disease patients with upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination as the gold standard: a diagnostic validation study. Pol J Radiol. 2023 Apr 5;88:e187-e193. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2023.126459. eCollection 2023. PMID 37234460
  • Li J, Zhu Y, Ni J, Wang L, Lei J. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal varices and risk assessment in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 Nov 6;30(6):335-350. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242723. Epub 2024 May 20. PMID 38767277
  • Zhang YH, Hu B. Future directions of noninvasive prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding: No worry about the present computed tomography inefficiency. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):108-111. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.108. PMID 38577650
  • Gunda DW, Kilonzo SB, Mamballah Z, Manyiri PM, Majinge DC, Jaka H, Kidenya BR, Mazigo HD. The magnitude and correlates of esophageal Varices among newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients undergoing screening fibre optic endoscope before incident bleeding in North-Western Tanzania; a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1123-9. PMID 31783802

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06707298 · MDCT in esophageal varices

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗