Meloxicam Versus Ibuprofen for Pain Control After Third Molar Exodontia in Adult Patients
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: meloxicam 7,5mg.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Dental Pain, Sensation Disorders. Basic parameters: 18 years — 59 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Analgesic Efficacy of Meloxicam Versus Ibuprofen for Pain Control After Third Molar Extraction in Adult Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial
Overview
Third molar extraction is a common dental procedure, offently related with pain and swelling. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if Meloxicam has a better effect relieving pain after the extraction than Ibuprofen, one of the most common pain relieving drugs administered after this procedure.
Detailed description
Summary: Third molar extractions are one of the most common procedures in dental practice. However, pain and swelling as postoperative sequelae are inevitable. Depending on the level of pain, which can range from moderate to severe, this symptomatology can be accompanied with pharmacological treatment, thus generating a less traumatic recovery for the patient. It is currently known that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have proven to be effective for the treatment of mild and moderate postoperative pain. Due to the wide variety of NSAIDs, it is important to know how to choose the most effective option when indicating one therapeutic option over another.
Objective: To evaluate the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of meloxicam (7.5 mg) compared to ibuprofen (400 mg) in patients undergoing third molar(s) extraction.
Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial, double-masked, designed according to CONSORT guideline requirements.
Interventions
- Drug meloxicam 7,5mg
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of Meloxicam Vs Ibuprofen
Primary outcome measures
- Meloxicam effectiveness for post-surgical pain control. [Time frame: 3 days]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Maxillary or mandibular third molar with semi or fully erupted crown.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with Systemic pathologies. Presence of third molar localized infection. Completely included third molar crown. Periodontal compromise. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Patients with hypersensitivity to NSAIDs. Patients with a history of drug abuse. Patients who had taken any drug in the previous 24 hours. Intervention (exodontia) time longer than 45 minutes.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Publications
- Haffar A, Fillingham YA, Breckenridge L, Gursay D, Lonner JH. Meloxicam versus Celecoxib for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Safety, Efficacy and Cost. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Apr 5;6(4):e22.00032. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00032. PMID 35389917
- Iqbal AM, Shetty P. Effect of Submucosal Injection of Tramadol on Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;77(9):1752-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.029. Epub 2019 Mar 29. PMID 31026419
- Moore RA, Derry S, Aldington D, Wiffen PJ. Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;2015(9):CD008659. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008659.pub3. PMID 26414123
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):100-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352. No abstract available. PMID 21350618
- Vallecillo C, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Galvez R, Vallecillo-Capilla M, Olmedo-Gaya MV. ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF TRAMADOL/DEXKETOPROFEN VS IBUPROFEN AFTER IMPACTED LOWER THIRD MOLAR EXTRACTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021 Dec;21(4):101618. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101618. Epub 2021 Jul 28. PMID 34922724
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06704113 · MelvsIbu