Menu
Recruiting NCT06701929

The Impact of Fasting Duration on Quality of Recovery After Cesarean Section

Observational Quality Improvement Quality of Recovery From Anaesthesia Cesarean Section Fasting ( 6H for Solid ; 2H for Clear Fluid )

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Quality Improvement, Quality of Recovery From Anaesthesia, Cesarean Section, Fasting ( 6H for Solid ; 2H for Clear Fluid ). Basic parameters: No limits · Female.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Canada
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

How Fasting Duration Before Cesarean Section Affects the Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11)

Overview

This study will evaluate the effect of fasting duration and elective c-section start time on the overall quality of recovery. Patients will be seen 24 hours after surgery to answer 11 questions on their overall recovery after surgery. Several factors will be tracked to determine their effect on recovery, with the primary variable of interesting

Detailed description

This is a prospective observational study aiming to evaluate the impact of fasting time before cesarean section on the quality of recovery after c-section. All patients presenting for elective cesarean section with low transverse incision, under spinal anesthesia will be considered for inclusion.

The primary outcome will be the ObsQoR-11 score approximately 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include the presence of nausea, vomiting or retching during surgery, the volume of intravenous fluid administered, the dose of vasopressor administered, the pain scores two hours after surgery, and the dose of opioid used in the 24 hours after surgery.

The primary analysis will be a linear regression to determine if there is a statistically significant correlation between fasting time and the ObsQoR-11 score while factoring in the variables mentioned above. Secondary analyses will determine if the fasting duration correlates with a change in any of the eleven components of the ObsQoR-11 score or the secondary outcomes listed. In addition, the fasting data will be plotted against the ObsQoR-11 score to determine if an inflection point is present.

Ten observations will be obtained for each independent variable included in the model, for a total of 100 patients in the study.

Primary outcome measures

  • Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-11) [Time frame: 3 months]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Nausea & Vomitting [Time frame: 24 hours]
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score 2 hours after surgery [Time frame: 2 hours after surgery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Presenting for elective c-section under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to communicate in French or English
  • Urgent c-section
  • Planned general anesthesia

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Canada · 1 center
  • Jewish General Hospital — Montreal

Publications

  • Kielty J, Borkowska A, Lawlor E, El-Khuffash AF, Doherty A, O'Flaherty D. Use of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) to measure the impact of an enhanced recovery programme for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024 Feb;57:103955. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103955. Epub 2023 Nov 10. PMID 38030526
  • Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, Habib AS, Landau R, Zakowski M, Tiouririne M, Bhambhani S, Carvalho B. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1362-1377. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005257. PMID 33177330
  • Ciechanowicz S, Setty T, Robson E, Sathasivam C, Chazapis M, Dick J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jan;122(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 31. PMID 30579408

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06701929 · ObsQoR-11 Survey (2025-4422)

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗