Menu
Recruiting NCT06693622

Patient Preferences for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer Screening Tests

Observational Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease Barrett Esophagus

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Patient survey.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett Esophagus. Basic parameters: 18 years — 89 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Patient Preferences for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer Screening Tests: A Discrete Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

Overview

This study plans to learn more about what patients think about screening for esophageal cancer (EAC) and Barrett's esophagus (BE); a pre-cancerous condition associated with esophageal cancer. The plan is to use this information to modify screening practices in the United States with the goal to decrease the number of people who die from esophageal cancer.

Detailed description

To achieve this goal, patient preferences for BE/EAC screening tests will be evaluated through a prospective multicenter discrete choice-based conjoint survey. Patients will choose between a series of hypothetical options and rank their priorities and what they value according to differences in benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms. By evaluating relative importance of test characteristics and patient prioritization the study will (1) define patient preferences and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening modalities to elicit the overall preferred test as well as differences in each attribute that informed that choice and (2) characterize differences in BE/EAC test preferences by patient sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race, ethnicity) and by the presence or absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Interventions

  • Behavioral Patient survey
    To assess patient preferences and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening modalities patients will complete a survey evaluating 5 domains: benefit of detection (sensitivity), convenience (time, setting), screening related physical harms (procedural discomfort), and financial harms. Prior to distribution, the survey will be refined and pretested among a sample of 5 patients.

Primary outcome measures

  • Define patient preferred BE/EAC screening test and barriers for attributes of BE/EAC screening tests [Time frame: Baseline]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Characterization of differences in BE/EAC test preferences by patient sociodemographic characteristics and by patient presence or absence of GERD [Time frame: Baseline]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision to sign and date the consent form.
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
  • Individual has 3 or more established risk factors for BE (age > 50 years, chronic GERD, male, white race, smoking, obesity, family history of BE/EAC).

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable to consent.
  • Prior diagnosis of BE/EAC.
  • Life limiting comorbidity/ disability.
  • Active dementia/ cognitive impairment.
  • Incarcerated.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus — Aurora

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06693622 · 23-1758

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗