Acute Heart Failure in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department with Acute Dyspnea: a Multimarker Approach Prognostic Study
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Acute Heart Failure (AHF), Dyspnoea. Basic parameters: from 75 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Background and Rationale: Acute dyspnea is a frequent presenting symptom in emergency departments (ED), with acute heart failure (AHF) being the most common cause leading to hospitalization in elderly patients. AHF in this population presents unique challenges in diagnosis, management, and risk stratification. Current tools for severity assessment and risk stratification (NT-proBNP and echocardiography) have shown limited evolution over the past 20 years and remain insufficient, particularly for elderly patients who predominantly present with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines specifically call for research on biomarkers within a multi-marker strategy for AHF risk stratification. Research Hypothesis: The study hypothesizes that a combination of biomarkers (NT-proBNP, High-sensitivity Troponin I, ST2, Galectin-3, CD146 and suPAR) will provide prognostic value and effectively stratify risk for early outcomes (90-day mortality and hospital readmission) in patients aged ≥75 years presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea and diagnosed with AHF. Primary Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of six biomarkers, both individually and in combination, for predicting 90-day all-cause mortality or ED readmission in elderly patients (≥75 years) presenting with acute dyspnea and diagnosed with AHF. Study Design: This is a prospective prognostic study including patients from 7 emergency departments from university and non-university hospitals in France. Study Population: (I) Patients aged ≥75 years presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea meeting at least two criteria: * Respiratory rate ≥25/min * PaO2 ≤70 mmHg * SpO2 ≤92% on room air * PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg and pH ≤7.35 * Oxygen requirement (ii) Have confirmed AHF diagnosis by two expert reviewers based on clinical data, laboratory results (excluding NT-proBNP), ECG, imaging, and specialized cardiac echo Primary Endpoint: Composite endpoint of 90-day all-cause mortality or ED readmission, as recommended by the ESC for evaluating early outcomes in AHF patients. Analysis plan includes: * ROC curves for optimal biomarker thresholds * Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank tests * Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses * Bootstrap methods for confidence intervals
Primary outcome measures
- Composite endpoint of 90-day all-cause mortality or ED readmission, as recommended by the ESC for evaluating early outcomes in AHF patients. [Time frame: 90-day]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients aged ≥75 years from the READ cohort (NCT04240067) who:
- Present to the ED with acute dyspnea meeting at least two criteria:
- Respiratory rate ≥25/min
- PaO2 ≤70 mmHg
- SpO2 ≤92% on room air
- PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg and pH ≤7.35
- Oxygen requirement
- Have confirmed AHF diagnosis by two expert reviewers based on clinical data, laboratory results (excluding NT-proBNP), ECG, imaging, and specialized cardiac echo
- Provided written consent for data use in the READ-MA-PRONO study
Exclusion criteria
- No written consent for data use in the READ-MA-PRONO study
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06692439 · 2022/725